There's been a lot of these kinds of projects. And they aren't always as popular as the project members think they will be.Ubuntu is popular because of GNOME, which is a simple and beautiful GUI, and Ubuntu's apt front-end which makes it easy to install applications and run updates.The Longhorn Linux team should have tried to mimic Windows 7. At least Windows 7 has Snap, and the Longhorn team could've written a Compiz plugin to introduce that feature in Linux.But now, there's no real advantage of mimicking Vista in Linux.
I'm sure I've mentioned before that Aero looks like somebody at Microsoft gave a 4-year-old kid a box of crayons (only 9, with no sharpener) and told him to make it look like Aqua. And the kid failed, but by then it was too late. I really don't see the point of making your OS look like the crappiest UI design of the last 5 years.
While these projects seem "neat" at first. I think they actually do more harm then good. Whats the point of even trying to get *Nix popular, if people will just think they are using windows anyways?
Was waporware then, is waporware now, will probably forever be waporware.This is the standard MS tactics, show something "soon we will be this good" to prevent customers from buying competitors products, then quickly back-pedal to mediocricy at release date. Worked like a charm every time until now. My god, amazing that so many people fall for it every time.[sic]
hi ,i started the longhorn linux project a while back , and i would like to tell you , it is not to mimic vi$ta's shitty interface , but more the concepts of vista , from the pre-reset period (wikipedia search it )we are aiming , finaly for a interface that resembles this :oxygen :Double-decked taskbarplex :Longhorn conceptaero :Windows Longhorn (with DWM enabled)to make a professional , free linux based os , with the ideas of this wonderfull creation , well ... until it became the horror today that we know as vista!