Apache isn't under the GPL either.
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.
So you have a problem with the GPL then?Oh wait, we've gone over this before.
In the future, anything and everything I write (as in programming stuff) in my own time, will almost definetly be GPLed (assuming it's my choice). Even libraries, so if some non-free feckor wants to link with my libraries, they may switch to a free-software licence or gtfo.
You've just outlined the exact reason why Y-Windows will fail.
In which case, let it fail!You do know that it's partly LGPL?
nautilus --no-desktop
Yeah. Hopefully, that will allow for commercial video driver support. If not, Y is already dead.
I don't think they have to do even that...
If they make drivers that link with the Y server, they must release themunder the GPL or not at all (score one for those of us running GNU/Linuxon anything other than x86, and another for us GPL "nuts" ). If theyfree their drivers, I would gladly volunteer to write a graphicalinstaller if only because I would be in such a good mood.If, on the other hand, they link with the client, (I'm sorry to say Idon't yet know enough about how Y works either to know which case wouldapply) they will be able to release the drivers as .o files.