Author Topic: Windows XP Source Tree  (Read 1577 times)

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Windows XP Source Tree
« on: 11 January 2004, 21:04 »
This is old but...

http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/info/xpsrctree.shtml

I wonder...someone here has to be familiar with the Linux source tree right?  Well, by looking at the above link, does this prove that Windows is really bloated?  (That is, are there too many files for as many fuctions as presented?)
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #1 on: 11 January 2004, 18:00 »
They should compile it for i586 already... it's not like someone with a 386 computer would want to install Windows XP on it  

KernelPanic

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Kudos: 222
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #2 on: 11 January 2004, 18:36 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
They should compile it for i586 already... it's not like someone with a 386 computer would want to install Windows XP on it    


X11 would sure try.
Contains scenes of mild peril.

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #3 on: 11 January 2004, 22:59 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
They should compile it for i586 already... it's not like someone with a 386 computer would want to install Windows XP on it    


lol I just noticed that  :D   Hell, they should compile it for i686, since a Pentium 1 can't run it very well either.  :D
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

Uipe

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.felisberto.com
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #4 on: 12 January 2004, 04:27 »
not too long ago all major linux distros came compiled for i386, I know a lot of people use old pc's for linux but never the less they should compile a version for updated computers...

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #5 on: 13 January 2004, 01:34 »
^ Mandrake is compiled for i586.  
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #6 on: 13 January 2004, 01:35 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
...it's not like someone with a 386 computer would want to install Windows XP on it    


Oh just thought I should mention...running XP on a 386 is like running KDE on the same thing.  :D   Heck, KDE doesn't run that well on Pentium.  :eek:
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

Uipe

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.felisberto.com
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #7 on: 13 January 2004, 04:29 »
wmd you shure are right lol

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #8 on: 13 January 2004, 21:57 »
quote:
Originally posted by WMD:


lol I just noticed that   :D    Hell, they should compile it for i686, since a Pentium 1 can't run it very well either.   :D  



Yes, but I think that some of the other CPU's (Cyrix, Transmeta, maybe even Athlon) would not work with the i686 instruction set ... I think the pentium instruction set is ok for most modern CPU's though.
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #9 on: 13 January 2004, 20:03 »
quote:
M. O'Brien: Yes, but I think that some of the other CPU's (Cyrix, Transmeta, maybe even Athlon) would not work with the i686 instruction set ... I think the pentium instruction set is ok for most modern CPU's though.


That's just pure bullshit in my opinion. Maybe you ought to explain that.  :confused:

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Windows XP Source Tree
« Reply #11 on: 14 January 2004, 01:26 »
Transmeta is a cool word

CRUSOE!
Go the fuck ~