All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company

How About THIS?(!)

<< < (2/4) > >>

psyjax:

quote:Originally posted by Gooseberry Clock:
The BBC are the Microsoft of the UK.
--- End quote ---


Perhapse the AOL/Time/warner

Calum:
oh piffle, they're not even a commercial company!
get rid of them and there's only private stations left (which pander to the advertisers by only televising lowest common denominator type shows)!

(actually i think that's how it is in the good old capitalist us of a, isn't it? do you guys have nationally funded broadcasting there?)

iancom:
I have to agree with Calum there. The BBC do produce some of the best television available in the UK. Being completely free from having to provide airspace attractive to advertisers they are able to show a good mix of popular television and also programmes of some actual merit - even during prime viewing hours.

Having said that, Channel Four also do a sterling job of programming some excellent television even though they do have commercial sponsors to suck up to. They even make their own (almost invariably excellent) films.

Compare these to the channels that wholly rely on advertising and you get:

Channel 5 - nauseating game shows of no intellectual merit whatsoever and made-for-tv films (eeek!).

Sky One - Star Trek, Buffy and the Simpsons? All the time? Hardly varied... sometimes entertaining but not really worth much.

Of course there are more, but they're mostly terrible.

There are some issues at the moment with the BBC trying to muscle in on markets that are not really part of its remit as a broadcasting entity - educacation markets for example. I think the press in this case has been a little alarmist. They are not using any really unfair means (with the possible exception of advertising such services on their own channels to the exclusion of all others) to do this, and they do still provide those services at a level unrivalled by most other commercial companies.

Oh yeah, and... we don't drive on the wrong side of the road, we drive on a DIFFERENT side of the road. Or sometimes the middle if we want. That's when we're not drinking Martini's on the banks of the Thames, of course.

jtpenrod:

quote: (actually i think that's how it is in the good old capitalist us of a, isn't it? do you guys have nationally funded broadcasting there?)
--- End quote ---

We have the PBS, and it gets the lion's share of its really high quality programming from the BBC  ;)  
________________________________

Powered by Mandrake Linux and Freedom
Computers are like air conditioners: they can't do their jobs if you open windows.

Calum:
re: driving on the wrong side of the road, historically the Brits drive on the correct side of the road.
As i heard it, the Brits invented the driving on one side of the road instead of the other concept, so the side that they chose to drive on first, is the correct side, that being the left side. Other former Brit empire countries such as Australuia and India also drive on the correct side of the road.
I suspect that the left/right thing would have come into being due to some import/export political thing between the Brits and somebody else, possibly the US, but equally conceivably the French or the Germans.

That driving on the left side thing is about the only thing i agree with the British empire about.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page