All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
How Apple+Mac is better than Windows+Intel
hm_murdock:
quote: Uh, not quite, it only runs on Apple hardware and it's expensive (not free). Maybe you should stick to picking on Windows so's we don't have to get in an argument.
--- End quote ---
void main, those are the advantages that it lacks. that's why I said *nearly* all =^)
Zombie, yes. P4s will overheat, and they suffer from the most serious design flaw of all... INTEL ACTUALLY MADE THE DAMNED THINGS.
Shittium 4s are the biggest waste of silicon since the Itanic. I hope Inhell goes the way of all the companies that MS has screwed up the bunghole.
Oh yeah, and even though I like AMD, they still make shitty x86 processors. The only reason x86 has an "edge" over PPC is that when you throw 3,000 MHz at something, yeah... it's gonna be faster.
It doesn't change the fact that WINDOWS SUCKS BIG FLOPPIN' DONKEY BALLS
And zombie, YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS THE BALL LICKER!
Zombie9920:
quote:Originally posted by The Jimmy James / Bob:
void main, those are the advantages that it lacks. that's why I said *nearly* all =^)
Zombie, yes. P4s will overheat, and they suffer from the most serious design flaw of all... INTEL ACTUALLY MADE THE DAMNED THINGS.
Shittium 4s are the biggest waste of silicon since the Itanic. I hope Inhell goes the way of all the companies that MS has screwed up the bunghole.
Oh yeah, and even though I like AMD, they still make shitty x86 processors. The only reason x86 has an "edge" over PPC is that when you throw 3,000 MHz at something, yeah... it's gonna be faster.
It doesn't change the fact that WINDOWS SUCKS BIG FLOPPIN' DONKEY BALLS
And zombie, YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS THE BALL LICKER!
--- End quote ---
You really are a stupid fucking idiot aren't you?
Proof that the Pentium 4 does not suffer heat failures.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q3/010917/index.html for the whole "How Modern Processors Cope With Heat Emergencies" article.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q3/010917/heatvideo-02.html for the results of what happens to a P4 when it gets too hot. For those of you who are too lazy to read it, the P4 slows down but is fully operational and no damage occurs to the CPU. I love how Tom the hardware guru says "It is pretty much impossible to 'fry' a Pentium 4 processor" which is opposite of what you the know nothing not a hardware guru says. It is obvious that you know nothing about hardware because you buy pre-built systems(made by Apple). It is obvious that you don't self build your systems. :rolleyes:
A PIII doesn't die from thermal issues either. If a PIII/Celeron gets too hot they simply freeze all operation to prevent damage to the CPU(they are fully functional again after you reset your comp).
Now, where is your proof to backup that Pentium 4s do burn up? I own several P4 systems(my 2.53ghz system handidly smokes any of your beloved Macs mind you. ;P) and I've tested out the thermal protection for the hell of it..and guess what, results from my testing prove to me that P4's don't burn up(even though little articles from reputable hardware gurus like Tom is enough proof to make me believe it).
If Intel CPU's were so much trash then why are the P4's reaching 3ghz+ speeds while AMD can barely produce any Athlons rated at 2800+(right now they are Sold out of the limited stock they had according to an article I read not very long ago and AMD is having trouble restocking them because the Athlons fail at the 2800+ speeds) and the G4 isn't even making it much farther than 1ghz. ;P
If you can't even get your facts straight about CPU design then how can anybody believe anything else you have to say? You are full of shit, end of story.
[ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: Zombie9920 ]
preacher:
You sit here and say that nobody wants to use an OS that requires command line knowledge with a beautiful gui on top, but it wasnt that long ago when everybody was using windows 95, and everyone was trying to learn dos commands. Whats the difference? Some people refuse to believe that learning the *nix command line is as easy as learning dos. Linux is in a progression stage right now, just like Windows was back then. However unlike windows which attempted to completely eliminate all use of the command line, linux will provide both a graphical and a command line way to do almost all things. I guarantee that one day we will reach the point where there will be no benefits of choosing windows over linux, because we will have reached the same functionality, and ease of use as them. At the same time we will offer lower costs and greater reliability, not to mention unparalleled flexibility. We arent there yet, but 5 years from now is a different story. If you dont believe linux will ever be a true competitor to windows, just look how much better linux has become in the recent past. Linux is the #2 OS for the x86 platform, and even though our numbers are low, thats still something to be proud of.
psyjax:
Here! Here!
Well said Preacher!!
*applaus* *applaus*
foobar:
I haven't heard anyone reply on the processor subject, but the only thing that i can say is that i've heard about them not blowing up your fan and your socket when you get to blow it up ... but i'm really not a processor geek ...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version