All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Ok consider this
lazygamer:
Ok imagine that a person chose to dualboot Windows for some "dumbass" reason. You know how there is that thing about W98 and threotically Windows XP "going to shit" after 2 years?(it may be possible that this is simply wear and tear, and nothing to do with a hidden "shit switch") What if having a wind0ze that can still run good(for wind0ze) at the 2 year mark has much better day to day stability?
I've heard it reported that W95 does not have the 2 year issue. If you had W95 special edition or OSR2, woulden't that make it significantly superior to W98? If the 2 year thing has a major effect on stability well before 2 years, woulden't that make W95 superior to XP?
cahult:
What you
rtgwbmsr:
2 years!? I've never had an XP installation last more than 6 months!
lazygamer:
LMAO! Actually, I've had heard it said more then once here that W98 never lasts more then 2 years.
Master of Reality:
thats simply because its very unstable
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version