All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Windows is easier to install than Linux
skyman8081:
quote:Originally posted by restin256:
Why do you waste your time here if you're obviously too stupid to ask for help on accredited places where people are known to help you? There's never been a case in which "RTFM" has been the only answer on Linuxforums or CTH.
--- End quote ---
This is where you took it too far. You personally insulted me instead of stating your case in this debate. Good Day.
hm_murdock:
You lose, Restin.
We've been perfectly nice during all this. Never once struck first with a flame. Only you're flaming here.
OldManRiver:
Hand writing is on the wall.
MS XP running on Red Hat Kernal
New Apple/MAC OS running on Red Hat Kernal
If they are both going to Linux why not you.
If you don't you'll be left behind.
Refalm:
quote:OldManRiver: MS XP running on Red Hat Kernal
New Apple/MAC OS running on Red Hat Kernal
--- End quote ---
Erm... :confused:
I guess XPde looks very much like Windows (screenshot), but I didn't know Windows runs on the Red Hat "Kernal".
By "Kernal", do you mean the customly compiled Linux kernel for Red Hat, or the core of Red Hat?
skyman8081:
quote:Originally posted by OldManRiver:
Hand writing is on the wall.
MS XP running on Red Hat Kernal
New Apple/MAC OS running on Red Hat Kernal
If they are both going to Linux why not you.
If you don't you'll be left behind.
--- End quote ---
What... The... Hell...?
what is a kernal, is it anything like a kernel?
Linux is an OS kernel, it does NOT interact with the user whatsoever.
XP/2003 Server have a POSIX LAYER for interactions. not the "Red Hat Kernal"
and Mac OSX has a BSD layer from its NeXT heritage, running on Mach. but that is all under the hood.
NOTHING to do with user interaction.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version