Author Topic: Windows v Linux security: the real facts (Read 962 times)

sime · « **on:** 25 October 2004, 12:54 »

Light blue touch paper... Stand well back... Let rip...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/linux_v_windows_security/

Windows securtiy.... bollocks!

Later

Sime

Refalm · « **Reply #1 on:** 25 October 2004, 13:43 »

Great article, takes a great punch at Microsoft's rediculous anti Linux campain.

Orethrius · « **Reply #2 on:** 25 October 2004, 14:27 »

"Windows security"; "military intelligence"; "safe sex"; "Microsoft Works" - these oxymorons and MORE are taking over the Capitol.
Film at 11.

[ October 25, 2004: Message edited by: Midnight Candidate/BOB ]

Refalm · « **Reply #3 on:** 25 October 2004, 15:21 »

quote:
Midnight Candidate/BOB: Film at 11.

Dude :confused:

Chilly · « **Reply #4 on:** 25 October 2004, 20:23 »

I'm sure this has been pointed out before....but isn't a window's primary purpose to be looked in?

WMD · « **Reply #5 on:** 26 October 2004, 03:55 »

quote:
Originally posted by Midnight Candidate/BOB:
"Windows security"; "military intelligence"; "safe sex"; "Microsoft Works"

What about "Dolphins offense?"

Stop Microsoft

News:

Author Topic: Windows v Linux security: the real facts (Read 962 times)

sime

Windows v Linux security: the real facts

Refalm

Windows v Linux security: the real facts

Orethrius

Windows v Linux security: the real facts

Refalm

Windows v Linux security: the real facts

Chilly

Windows v Linux security: the real facts

WMD

Windows v Linux security: the real facts