Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

For blindfolded UNIX worshippers

(1/5) > >>

www.unixsucks.com:
http://www.unixsucks.com

Enjoy,

And I almost forgot - here is a headers from www.kmfms.com. Looks like PHP is vulnerable there.
And also why on so "Secure and good Apache" I can see just straight out in header what version of web server is being run and script engine? Very secure indeed.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:46:14 GMT\r\n
Server: Apache/1.3.26 (Unix)  (Red Hat/Linux) mod_throttle/3.1.2 PHP/4.1.2\r\n
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2\r\n
Connection: close\r\n
Content-Type: text/html\r\n
\r\n

Master of Reality:
you can set apache to show or not show that

Master of Reality:

quote:Windows built on NT kernel is extremely reliable system, there are system integrators over there which would guarantee you 99,99% of uptime on Windows OS (http://www.compaq.com/services/available/av_uptime.html, http://www.dell.com/us/en/epg/services/service_99_9.htm), I have not seen such claims from Linux distributors. The common problem with so called BSD (Blue Screen Of Death) in 90% of the cases called by hardware not being on HCL (Hardware Compatibility List) or drivers not signed by Microsoft or poorely written third party programs.
--- End quote ---

so how do you explain that at least the top 50 uptimes on webservers are all running on BSD/apache except one which is IRIX/netscape enterprise?
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html

..and maybe you should try i spellchecker next time you create a website. I noticed on other pages you had some words that didnt exist, such as satanistic... you probly mean satanic.

[ August 20, 2002: Message edited by: Master of Reality / Bob ]

www.unixsucks.com:
Pretty easy. Nobody cares about that site, wether it's running or not, secure or not, serves pages or not. Look at no.2 - wwwprod1.telia.com. Impressed? How secure is it? Here is headers which shows that it has not been updated for 2 years and subject to numorous exploits.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:11:44 GMT\r\n
Server: Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) PHP/3.0.1\r\n
Connection: close\r\n
Content-Type: text/html\r\n
\r\n
I swear, give me colocation or hosting facility, I'll put IIS with single static page and would get the same results.
Also survey only take samples of single web servers which is not typical scenario in business since you usually have webfarms to handle traffic.

GReg

www.unixsucks.com:
Hmmm,

As far as I remember from my experience with Solaris, you have to reboot after installation of major system patches upgrades and I beleive if owner of wwwprod1.telia.com has 2 year old Apache on that server, he might have old and vulnerable OS as well, which needs to be patched as well.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page