Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX
Hardware supported in Linux
WMD:
They can't really...not enough money. They make profits but only because they don't. They could, if...there was a larger user base.
*bangs head against wall*
Refalm:
quote:Aloone: I can't see why Red Hat and other Linux companies don't invest more in hardware companies.
--- End quote ---
Red Hat is starting to do that:
http://hardware.redhat.com/hcl/
[ July 18, 2004: Message edited by: Refalm ]
insomnia:
quote:Originally posted by Aloone:
My guess is that Linux is a free operating system and theirs fuck all in it for them.
Both my digital camera and printer/scanner came with both Windows and Mac drivers.
Linux appears to be in a vicious circle at the moment, to get people to use it, you need drivers, but to get most hardware companies to write drivers, it has to have a large enough user base.
I can't see why Red Hat and other Linux companies don't invest more in hardware companies.
--- End quote ---
I don't have any hardware that isn't suported.
Aloone_Jonez:
Why?
I suppose that you check that a piece of hardware supports Linux before you buy it.
WMD:
I'm sure he does...and it's not a bad idea at all. You might have to pay more because cheap hardware is the stuff that uses crappy Windoze-only drivers.
I checked out myself, and everything I bought is supported - except my wireless card (I thought it was).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version