All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Microsoft Settlement
Kintaro:
http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=2625
Crunchy(Cracked)Butter:
I was just about to post this as well.
Anyway here are some more links.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,72
04,5408913%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/27895.html
http://news.com.com/2009-1001-964255.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed
Kinda shitty if you asked me, makes you wonder if the judge is corrupt or just totally fucking inept.
After all these years it might end this way, what a waste, yet it IS proven they are a monopoly, how does that work. You are proven guilty but get off scott free.
I hope the 9 states appeal and the EU commission make a better thing out of it. At least in hte EU the public are allowed their say.
message edited due to poor page scansion.
[ November 05, 2002: Message edited by: Calum & his insidious little spies ]
Kintaro:
Okay, lets start a petition... We will talk to quirk about hosting a Submission form with PHP. Him or M0R!
Crunchy(Cracked)Butter:
Petition for what?
BTW another important link: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/27896.html
[ November 02, 2002: Message edited by: Crunchy(Cracked)Butter ]
lazygamer:
So why did they back down? Did they not visit www.kmfms.com or something? How the fuck can you back down when you learn the true face of Microsoft?
Errr anyone want to tell me:
1)Wasn't this settled years ago?
2)What was the original "1337" punishment sought by the DOJ?
3)What is the neutered one?
4)Why did they back down?
5)This shit is now over right?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version