Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

gpg error

<< < (2/3) > >>

portaloo:
i think i get it, it's a little like m$ certification right?

yes i went ahead with the installation anyway  :D   and after a lot of attempts i could access the internet. i think i'll just swallow the bickies and buy me a new modem

Calum:

quote:Originally posted by portaloo:
i think i get it, it's a little like m$ certification right?
--- End quote ---


well actually it's nothing at all like anything microsoft have ever done, however i think the analogy is fine for the meaning i think you mean. it's only really important for nitpickers like me to distinguish the differences...

Master of Reality:
it would be for if the package was encrypted wouldnt it?

voidmain:
The package itself is not encrypted. It's just an encrypted signature. See "man rpm", it explains it all. It *is* similar to signed software in M$. It's just a way to verify where the RPM came from. Signatures are not required and if it doesn't have one and you don't tell RPM to ignore signatures with the "--ignoresignature" in the command line then you will get the warning message that the package is not signed.

[ December 12, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

portaloo:
cool, so i'm not as green as the cabbage i smoke

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page