Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

FreeBSD

<< < (4/4)

xyle_one:
uhh, freeBSD looks like a challenge. i like challenges, and she wants to learn a unixOS.  and uh, Windows98 for a secure... anything??

choasforages:
huh, challenge, FreeBSD is easy these days. try NetBSD or OpenBSD. and yes, i actally use NetBSD alot.  but if your hardware is supported, OpenBSD has a few more newer packages foor it then NetBSD.

Nobber:
I dual-boot between Linux and FreeBSD, but I haven't used FreeBSD much. First impressions were that FreeBSD is trickier, because recompiling the kernel is really a must - whereas it isn't with modern Linux distros - but it's also much easier to get a kernel compilation failure in FreeBSD than it is in Linux. (In fact, I don't think I've *ever* had a kernel comp failure in Linux.)

Other than that, it's really just a matter of getting used to the BSD-style init mechanism, and the different device names. For example, under FreeBSD my modem is /dev/cuaa4, which the kernel sets up automatically. Eh? KDE's internet dialler doesn't even let me choose that as a modem device...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page