All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Surpride Settlement Splits Microsoft
voidmain:
Unfortunately the company I do a little contracting for had 0 *NIX until I started doing some work for them. Now they have several Linux boxen. And they also have 0 *NIX literate people, but I am changing that. In fact I don't believe any of them are actually MCSEs (I just use that term for anyone who only knows MS OSs). They are actually better than MCSEs because as an MCSE by default you can't even trouble-shoot your way out of a cardboard box.
iancom:
Yeah... I've worked with (read tolerated) MCSE's before. They think they know everything when in fact they can't even properly maintain the systems they've been trained for never mind opening up their minds to anything else.
A few years ago I worked through an NT MCSE book. After I had finished it I realised why this is. The MCSE does not prepare you for real-life situations, interoperability and most disturbingly it does not give you any real problem-solving abilities. There are predefined problems to each of which they advocate only one predefined solution. There is no scope for creativity in problem resolution. If you don't do it their way, it's wrong - even if your way works just as well or better. Needless to say I decided not to waste any money on taking the exams.
Wherever possible, I prefer to take people on at a junior level who show real enthusiasm for IT, logical thinking and common sense. Their actual professional computing experience is almost irrelevant as far as I'm concerned...
voidmain:
I totally agree! The last company I worked for (about 5 years worth) had several MCSEs. Guess who they called when they had problems with their MS DNS, WINS, NetBIOS, TCP/IP, NetBEUI, registry, virus, and more problems when they couldn't figure them out? It was so bad I was spending more time fixing Win* problems even though I was the top *NIX guy at the company, I just plain got burned out on it and gave up hope.
And I don't know how many times I've been asked "Do you have your MCSE?" and I have to answer "no, and the day I need to get one is the day I get out of the computer business". It makes me sick when HR people think having an MCSE is important. When I hired people to work for me if I saw MCSE on their resume they went straight to the bottom of the pile.
I'll bet 50% of the MCSEs I've met have never touched a server or any other operating system other than MS Win95/98 and just studied the books and took the tests as their ticket into a server job. Turns out when they get into the real world they do not have a clue, nor are they apt to get a clue even after a year or more of being in the field (most, not all of them). Then, their cert becomes worthless when the next version of Win* comes out and they have to study and take more tests to become certified in the new version. When do they have time to learn real trouble-shooting and problem resolution?
So in my opinion, the *only* thing that an MCSE certification ensures, is more money for Bill Gates. It puts them on a one way course to nowhere. And if the MS empire ever *does* fall, they will be flippin' burgers, but hey, the world needs burger flippers too.
[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: VoidMain ]
iancom:
The MCSE programme is another one of M$'s Fear, Uncertaintly and Doubt tactics to strengthen their stranglehold on the server market. It's easy to pass (it would have to be having seen some of the muppets who have passed it!) and so there are loads of people out there proudly proclaiming their MCSE status on their CV's.
This leads companies to believe that they will always have access to a large pool of employees that are skilled in maintaining, upgrading and troubleshooting a M$-based infrastructure. This is of course seen as a Good Thing by upper manglement and thus M$ infrastructures are deployed and a policy of hiring MCSE's implemented.
Unfortunately, upper manglement are so far removed from the sharp-end of the IT infrastructure that they really don't understand the consequences of this policy. And the real killer here is...
...because they only employ MCSE's there is no-one capable of properly explaining to manglement why the infrastructure is not performing as well as it should, and no non-M$ solutions are ever considered. The company invests in more servers and M$ products because they assume they have just overloaded them and need to spread the load.
You know what's coming next.
The use of M$ products now has so many companies in the position such that to support their user base they are having to add new servers every year. Implementation and maintenance costs rise. New MSCE staff are hired to look after the spiralling numbers of servers.
Where can they go? What can they do?
".NET" says Microsoft.
"We'll take those server costs and troubles off your hands for you."
"For a fee. And by the way, if you're late paying us we'll sell your data to your competition."
"What the hell, we'll probably do that anyway. Read the EULA"
They are creating problems so that people will buy the otherwise unnecessary solution from them... a solution which will of course have its own problems.... ad infinitum.
badkarma:
quote:Originally posted by IanC:
Wherever possible, I prefer to take people on at a junior level who show real enthusiasm for IT, logical thinking and common sense. Their actual professional computing experience is almost irrelevant as far as I'm concerned...
--- End quote ---
Amen
If I weren't already employed I would have asked you for a job ;)
21, no degrees (college drop out, long story, don't ask ), no actual prior professional programming experience but got hired as a (jr) programmer (this may come over a bit cocky but I wouldn't have expected otherwise ) and have been working there for about 7 months now and am really loving it, and have learned more there in 7 months then in 2 years of college (by far ....)
We have some MCSE books lying around the office but it's still quite the mystery as to why seeing we are a linux only company
[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: BadKarma ]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version