All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Ballmer admits Linux' TCO is lower than Windows (duh!).
choasmaster:
64 processors, thats weak. check out a fully loaded origin 3800. 512 procossers. i think 500 gigs of rams or maybe more
Calum:
quote:Originally posted by VoidMain:
Hey, it's quality not quantity that counts.
--- End quote ---
i agree!
re: whining about you not quoting, i don't think people should have to quote, i just like to follow people around and quote in case people can't be arsed clicking a lot of links, however if you don't want to quote, then why should you have to? No, you keep not quoting in the full knowledge that i won't be whining at you, for one. I might still post quotes or excerpts though...
re: the actual article, ballmer is definitely earning his keep as a worthless piece of detritus who does Microsoft more harm than good, the only question that remains is, why do they keep him on?
voidmain:
I actually enjoy you following me around and quoting the article. It does make it easier, and I can't get in trouble.
lazygamer:
quote:64 processors, thats weak. check out a fully loaded origin 3800. 512 procossers. i think 500 gigs of rams or maybe more
--- End quote ---
WOW! Ummm with that much power, what would you use it for? In theory, if you need THAT much power then the programmers aren't pulling their weight!
Oh I know, it's probably used to take into account trillions of variables to determine things like the % chance that planet earth will spontaneously combust in the next year or something. ;)
voidmain:
If you have to ask, then you don't need that many processors.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version