Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

webservers performance.. linuxoze vs M$ related

(1/7) > >>

DukePuke:
wtf.. just got disscussion somethere, where some motherfuckers yelled that linux + apache is total crap, insecure,full of bugs, and they are owned by M$ IIS by total server count. (lol, where from such morons came from)..  but strange thing, that they gave me document about webservers performance.. this is quite huge, and looks like serious.. btw i dont know what to say but here it is :

http://www.veritest.com/clients/reports/microsoft/ms_competitive_webbench_performance.pdf

this is strange, microsoft's webservers is fastest?    
btw should i believe it?

[ May 12, 2004: Message edited by: DukePuke ]

Refalm:
Nope, there're more webservers running Apache:

(website)

DukePuke:
heh OK, i know that apache is most popular webserver software but by the way I suggest read that document, which i posted here. This is about webservers performance, speed, etc.. I DONT care what bunch of morons talk that apache is shit and so on, they are unalphabetic kids. but this document looks like strange..

insomnia:

quote:Originally posted by DukePuke:
heh OK, i know that apache is most popular webserver software but by the way I suggest read that document, which i posted here. This is about webservers performance, speed, etc.. I DONT care what bunch of morons talk that apache is shit and so on, they are unalphabetic kids. but this document looks like strange..
--- End quote ---


Try this:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/05/04/most_reliable_hosting_providers_during_april.html

DukePuke:
insomnia and refalm, ok, you are people who helped me a lot, but i dont ask you much this time.. just opinion about this document :

http://www.veritest.com/clients/reports/microsoft/ms_competitive_webbench_performance.pdf

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page