Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

Windows more secure than Linux

(1/6) > >>

slave:
Vulnerability tracker gives Windows cleaner bill of health than Open Source

http://www.vnunet.com/News/1128907

"Windows suffered fewer security vulnerabilities than Linux last year, according to figures released by vulnerability tracker SecurityFocus."

"For five years straight, in fact, Windows has come out less scathed than Linux, with 2000 pinpointed as the most significant year when Linux suffered over 150 vulnerabilities and Windows fell just short of 100."

ravuya:
vnunet sucks. try the register, at least they're funny.

feel your trolling advantage slipping away any, xp boy?

slave:
The Register would never report something like this as they are biased Linux advocates.  You cannot deny it, however, regardless of who said it.  No one can honestly say Linux is more secure than Windows if they look at the facts; Linux is just more unpopular.  Even many Linux advocates will admit this.  When Microsoft hiccups, everyone hears about it.  Tux can catch Ebola and people seem to just sweep it under the rug.

Heru:
Very few people trust vnunet for anything more than a waste of space.

Your last few posts have been useless.
Your runnig out of evidence aren't you?

Don't you have anything better to do than post here trying to get people to use Windows instead?

I wouldn't have replied to this, but someone already had, so I thought 'what the hell'.

slave:
PS I'm not trolling, I'm informing.
There's a big difference.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page