Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

Mandrake vs. Lycoris?

<< < (2/3) > >>

preacher:
I could list off 100 distros other than those 2, but since Mandrake is what I use, I reccommend it.

Calum:

quote:Originally posted by scott:
I currently have Lycoris Desktop/LX and Mandrake 8.2 on my PC. I have a couple of questions:
1. Which one is better? Which one is more functional? Which one is easier to use?
2. Should I upgrade Mandrake 8.2 to 9? Is 9 stable?
 Thanks.
--- End quote ---


1. Yes, yes and yes.
2. If mandrake 8.2 is fine for you then there's little difference as far as i can see, but if you want newer versions of KDE, GNOME, Openoffice, mozilla etc, then this is the easiest way to do it. 9 is as stable as 8.2 as far as i can see.

Nobber:

quote:Originally posted by scott:
I currently have Lycoris Desktop/LX and Mandrake 8.2 on my PC.

Which one is better? Which one is more functional? Which one is easier to use?

--- End quote ---


If you already have them installed, why don't you try them out yourself and see if you can answer your own questions? You don't need us to tell you what to think.

Calum:
yeah! shouldn't you be saying 'i have lycoris and mandrake, now how do red hat, suse, freeBSD and slackware compare?' or something like that?

Stryker:

quote:Originally posted by [calum@localhost]$:
yeah! shouldn't you be saying 'i have lycoris and mandrake, now how do red hat, suse, freeBSD and slackware compare?' or something like that?
--- End quote ---


hmm, how is slackware? I am considering downloading it but i'm on dialup again. Want some opinions before i risk wasting my time.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page