Operating Systems > macOS
You guys think that Macs are so damn fast? Have a look at this.
ravuya:
quote:Originally posted by the_black_angel:
XP!! The installer crashed twice
And within a day it had crashed three times, once it totally froze - i could not do anything, the other two imes it scrolled a heap of text across the screen then restarted, i would tell you what the text said but it scrolled too fast for me to read it.
This is extremely similiar to a Mac OS X Kernel panic (i randomly deleted things out of core services )
Windows displays graphics extremely badly compared to an apple, get exactly the same image and look at it on a mac and then look at in windows and you will see a difference.
--- End quote ---
Yes, and Windows has problems with color. A page will look entirely different when rendered in Windows.
The XP installer crashed when it ran out of disk space half way through the install. Shouldn't it... you know... CHECK?
Kintaro:
quote:Originally posted by Ravuya:
it looks like Windows caught up with CD-ROMS, by right-clicking a CD-ROM in Windows and picking 'Eject' it will eject. But, nope, Windows won't eject floppies. Because x86 floppy drives suck.
--- End quote ---
Im working on building one that does. Maybe even writing some software to eject if via ParaPort.
Im going to compare a Z/80 based machine with a pushbutton for a cpu (hit rapidly) with a P-IV 2.0ghz
Compare a G4-1ghz with a P-3 1 ghz and see who wins!
Kintaro:
quote:Originally posted by Windows XP User #5225982375:
They should be concerened since x86 hardware is cheaper and more powerful.
PS Windows XP doesn't crash, you silly gooses
--- End quote ---
Windows XP does crash, Linux does crash, Mac does crash, everything can crash... unplug your CPU well the system is running... it will crash!
You are an idiot because i had XP and it kept crashing and i know what your thinking "Screwy Hardware" well its not my fault XP cant handle my setup, but dont take it out on us Linux users.
So why do you post here XP Luser?
Kintaro:
Anyway XP Luser was saying XP starts faster than KDE, so i timed them all....
SCSI Enabled:
XP: 49.7 secs
KDE: 7.8 secs
LINUX: 45.2 secs
GNOME: 4.2 secs
No SCSI:
XP: 15.2 secs
KDE: 7.8 secs
LINUX: 35.2 secs
GNOME: 4.2 secs
The fact is that XP does start faster but i have a dodgy SCSI controller that needs a delay on XP and Win2k to stop crashes. And Linux it just takes extra time, same with XP.
Anyway I think i have proven that XP Luser is a bullshit artist, everyone post your times!
voidmain:
I don't have to post my times, I never turn my computers off. I guess that would be "0" seconds.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version