Operating Systems > macOS
Adobe Says: Get a PC, Jerks!
xyle_one:
quote:Originally posted by Billy Gates: Mac Comrade Captain:
Ya, because Linux doesn't have big name apps, like Photoshop, Flash MX, Dreamweaver MX, MS Office, or IE
Not that I like IE, just Linux aint got it.
Oh, lets not forget how difficult Linux is to use and change compared to Windows and the Mac.
I know PC's are faster, my 1.7 GHz Athlon blows my 733 PowerMac out of the water (and cost about half the price). But OSX is so insanely great, it is worth the extra money and the performance hit.
--- End quote ---
well. linux really isnt that hard (it is still hard though) to use. and we really do not need those "Big" name apps. we especially do not need ms office of IE. as soon as linux picks up on the desktop, you can be sure that adobe & macromedia will write native apps for it. shit, osX is unix, and we have those apps. so its only a matter of time. i do like photoshop over gimp though. so i welcome photoshop on linux. i wouldnt even mind Studio MX ;)
my dual athlon 1.2ghz w/1gig ddr does not compare to my dual 1ghz g4 w/512. my mac smokes it, so for me, the upgrade was worth it. and the money i spent would have been the same had i decided to get a new pc instead.
TheQuirk:
1) RH 10.0 will be better than OS 10, but by that time, I'm sure Apple will create something extremly cool (and by that time, I'll have a mac!).
2) Because more people use Flash than Moho by an insane amount of people.
3) How can you even BEGIN to compare Dreamweaver to Vim (not WYSIWYG), Mozilla Composer--a silly, worthless toy when it comes to real web work, Quanta, which is not a WYSIWYG, or to a non-existent product?
4) Because I know how to use Photoshop and the UI is much friendlier IMHO.
5) Agreed, except MS Office is still better than OO.org (aside from al lthe security holes and that god damn clippy).
slave:
I didn't know Mozilla composer was silly -- I've never laughed when using it. What do you mean by "real" web work? As opposed to unreal web work? What other type is there?
By the way, Moz composer + vi can be very powerful if you're not an HTML n00b Moz can be used to "flesh out" a webpage and then refined in vi.
billy_gates:
quote:Originally posted by Linux User #5225982375:
I didn't know Mozilla composer was silly -- I've never laughed when using it. What do you mean by "real" web work? As opposed to unreal web work? What other type is there?
By the way, Moz composer + vi can be very powerful if you're not an HTML n00b Moz can be used to "flesh out" a webpage and then refined in vi.
--- End quote ---
Dreamweaver is an app that can do everything, I don't know how to use 90% of the stuff in it. Mozilla Composer is for people that want to build their first web page. Dreamweaver is for building an enterprise size web site and managing it. Along with all of the things in that site, JSP, PHP, Java, Javascript, etc ,etc. I am, however, trying to do my site only with plain text. I think, though, I will make my site with dreamweaver, then fix it up in TextEdit.
Photoshop is much easier to use than the GIMP. Don't even know what MOHO is, don't even want to know. If it is like how Adobe tried to make an swf maker, it is probably terrible.
What is wrong with proprietary software? it is often better than Free Software. Its not like people shun proprierary cars or cpu's or stereos or tv's or light bulbs. Should we avoid those too?
bling:
quote:Originally posted by Billy Gates: Mac Comrade Captain:
What is wrong with proprietary software? it is often better than Free Software. Its not like people shun proprierary cars or cpu's or stereos or tv's or light bulbs. Should we avoid those too?
--- End quote ---
!!!! You shouldn't have said that to him! He has the damn FSF in his sig! You are in for a RANT, my lad!
:D
I sense RMS quotes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version