Miscellaneous > The Lounge

I don't hear you screaming. Why is that?

<< < (6/7) > >>

voidmain:

quote:Originally posted by www.unixsucks.com:
It was not answered you face fuck.
You peed on yourself this time really. I expected more sense from "most reputable" person in this group.
Fuck you and all your fucking *NIX lover friends.
I'm off this newsgroup as I can see that people just dumber and less reasonable then I expected.
I knew that I can not question your religion but you just idolizing things and shrug off everything which does not fall into places.


P.S.
One more, time "FUCK YOU". Bearing in mind how many times I have been cursed on before I'm entitles as many "FUCKS" as I want.
And I have enough money to buy another computer if I want, I already have 5 at home (all running Windows) but I'd really think next time if I would decide to install Linux becouse of dumb fucks like you standing behind it.
And I'm not going to read this message board anymore so you can start now your public masturbation.
--- End quote ---


YEAH!!!!!! Can anyone not read this? It's locked in time. Hell, I might even stick it in my tag line. We'll see if he really means it "this" time. I somehow feel he'll be back.

badkarma:
just to do unixsucks a favour (seeing he avoids answering any of my posts anyway)

FUCK!

eradicator:

quote:Originally posted by www.unixsucks.com:
http://www.openssh.com/txt/trojan.adv
So, let's see, if Windows has some security problems then you bitch, if any of *NIX programs has security problems, then you do what? Yes, you just hide it, like nothing happened.
I can't beleive it, it's not just that your super secure UNIX machines was hacked, program UNIX people rely on was compromised as well at the same time.
Good example to be given to government bodies about security involving open source. At least if I download from Microsoft I get signed packages first and second I get it from trusted source (I don't know any example when trojan was embedded in Microsoft product).
Now, please what you gonna say?
--- End quote ---


for being in your 30's, you really don't act it. and if you knew anything about UN*X developers; you should know they take security in a very serious way, and they spit out a patch ASAP.

sporkme:
important to note: none of those yes-yes-yesses are a license agreement containing "we can delete anything or add anything to your computer any time we want, and you can't know about it, let alone do a damned thing about it, because we are watching you"

it certainly doesnt install a secret operating system, built around its flawed web browser so to eliminate competition.

it doesn't install bill gates dirty little fingers into your wallet.

it does install x-bill

if your mouse didn't work you did not try linux

your jumpy mouse cursor is because you have a mouse that was designed fundamentally for windows, i had one of those (made in ethiopia)... or there is crap in the optical cogs inside.  curiously, a microsoft mouse will operate fine under linux (???!).


oh, and you truly are a fucking moron

ha

and you just didn't know how to create a partition for linux, and you are afraid to install newer linux distros because you're afraid you'd fall in love.

[ August 27, 2002: Message edited by: sporkme / bob ]

choasforages:
dude, my 266 mhz laptop which is currently enslaved to windows mistaken edition, is unresponsive, useless, and pisses me off, first the mouse lags really bad, then it crashes, and doesn't un hibernate like linux did on it, the only thing taht windows has giong for it is sound support, but im not sure if FreeBSD supports the sound, now, with my 60mhz pentium/*a dell*/ with it running debian 2.6 it is very responsive, still useful and does work for me. now as soon as OpenOffice.org is avialable for FreeBSD, ill run it instead. now for stuff like cameras. come one, gphoto2 has a great interface, and works better then kodaks software. and for kde's ssl bug, ummmm, i can actally use the patched verison, why, cuase i installed kde 3.0.3, now suprisingly, my microsoft optical mouse works better under linux then under windows. first i don't have to FUCK WITH DRIVERS, it works damnit, and, i bet windows will never run on my box as fast as ChoasNETOS can. every one in hear who knows about it, let this idiot figure out why ChoasNETOS smokes windows performance wise?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page