All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Is the end near for Microsoft?
lazygamer:
/cheers loudly
Never imagined this could happen(powerful lawsuit that is).
Even if the full amount is not payed, it could still be a very damaging amount they "plea bargain" for.
Question is, will MS suddenly start making Wind0ze far more secure?
What would be extra useful though, is a big media circus about this. Get people doubting MS, than get moronic "security experts" creating hysteria about hackers being able to hack your Windows box and steal your credit card info etc(which is hardly farfetched, but in principle it's still media BS).
quote:The Federal Trade Commission last year demanded that Microsoft improve its Passport security or face stiff fines of up to $11,000 per violation. Redmond promised to work harder to protect consumer information and launched it's Trustworthy Computing initiative to put regulators' minds at ease.
Well, the FTC is looking into the Passport breach and could slap Microsoft with a fine of $2.2 trillion to cover all 200 million violated users.
"If we were to find that they didn't take reasonable safeguards to protect the information, that could be an order violation," Jessica Rich, assistant director for financial practices at the FTC, told the AP.
--- End quote ---
So not only have they been warned, but they are being charged with screwing over 200 million users!!! Ok even if they weasel out, MS is up against some big odds here, something's gotta happen.
Ok but I'm worried about this "reasonable safeguards" thing. This could be their weasel area.
jtpenrod:
quote:Question is, will MS suddenly start making Wind0ze far more secure?
--- End quote ---
There's so much kludgy code in there already that "suddenly" making it secure will not be possible. They have made some progress in this area lately, however, this hasn't been the first security breech of the Passport system. They still have one helluva long road ahead of them to make Winderz as secure as Linux.
quote:So not only have they been warned, but they are being charged with screwing over 200 million users!!! Ok even if they weasel out, MS is up against some big odds here, something's gotta happen.
Ok but I'm worried about this "reasonable safeguards" thing. This could be their weasel area.
--- End quote ---
You can be sure that His Gatesness' legal eagles will play up the "reasonable safeguards" thing for all it's worth. There will for sure be bad publicity over this. And it could very well take considerable luster off the whole .NET (or whatever the hell they're calling it this week) scam... er... scheme. OTOH, I could see this as being a springboard into Palladium (or whatever the hell they're calling it this week). They may very well use this as an excuse to get laws passed that mandate "Fritz chips" and the rest of it that locks out all non-M$ apps. :mad: Let's hope to hell that doesn't happen.
Of course, judging from their performance in court during the anti-trust trial, there's an even better possibility that they'll pull some more bone-headed stunts in court and really piss off the judge. As an extra bonus, we may get to see Steve "Monkey-Boy" Ballmer saying more foolish things. :D
______________________________________
Live Free or Die: Linux
"There: now you'll never have to look at those dirty Windows anymore"
--Daffy Duck
Calum:
quote:So not only have they been warned, but they are being charged with screwing over 200 million users!!! Ok even if they weasel out, MS is up against some big odds here, something's gotta happen.
--- End quote ---
bollocks!
you just watch the sheep, it'll be "oh woe, save us mr gates! we must use windows but now the mean nasty judge has told us it is not safe! you must make it safe for us so we need never fear that our computers might be compromised by those filthy long haired hackers ever again!"
how likely do you think it is that the sheep will accept an OS made from the ground up by these filthy long haired hackers their culture has brought them up to despise?
remember it is a minority who think for themselves.
Zombie9920:
This is completely false. The Register has a habit of reporting stuff like a tabloid would. They took the $11,000 per incident fine and took the number of accounts(200 million) and multiplied the numbers together. There is no basis to this story other than some fool making assumptions and stories up.
Faust:
Actually there is a fairly large basis for that story. Mainly that an inanely stupid fuck up from Microsoft was discovered in less that half an hour by a single computer security advisor. And that this flaw compromised the security details of an extremely large number of people. I do agree that the numbers are exagerated though.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version