All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Microsoft Settlement Feedback
voidmain:
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms-major.htm
Man, there is some *good* readin' in these feedback letters!!
voidmain:
And I am also happy to note that the www.usdoj.gov web site is *not* running MS/IIS. They "appear" to alternate between Apache and Netscape-Enterprise/4.0 on Solaris and have been for at least the last year and a half.
voidmain:
I read a majority of those letters, only one support the so called "remedy" as proposed. Most of them appeared to get their information from www.fuckmicrosoft.com as they expressed a lot of issues that we've been talking about here. Now if only the courts will listen will it be a brighter future.
I get the feeling though, if they do what they appear to have done the first time around. Is draft a new remedy and then go to Microsoft and say "Does this look ok to you?". And Microsoft will of course reply "Hell no, go back and try again!". <sigh> I don't understand why Microsoft has *anything* to do with the acceptance of a remedy, after all, they were the ones found "guilty".
Gonusto:
quote:I don't understand why Microsoft has *anything* to do with the acceptance of a remedy, after all, they were the ones found "guilty".
--- End quote ---
Because they have money . . .
-Gonusto
Gonusto:
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-846338.html
quote:The period of public comment closed one month ago, with 15,000 of the 30,000 respondents arguing against the settlement. Overall, the comments opposed the proposed deal by a 2-to-1 margin.
--- End quote ---
I wonder how many of it's employees Microsoft had to pay to get even that many votes . . . ?
-Gonusto
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version