Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

The shittyest distro

(1/12) > >>

Aloone_Jonez:
Well there's a thread to discuss your favorate distro, now how about the one that sucks the most?

Redhat/Fedora
I came to this forum dissing Linux because I'd had a bad experiance with Redhat 9 - it's slower than XP and often locks up. I recently tried Fedora Core 3 and it hasn't improved at all it's just as bloated as ever and to think people criticise Windows for this.

Linspire
I admit I haven't tried Linspire but it sucks because you have to pay to get software that would otherwise be free and their marketing policy is a joke too:http://www.gapmanwebdesign.com/runlinspire.php

WMD:
Linare:
http://www.linare.com

MS Linux: :D
http://www.mslinux.org

SCO Linux: (discontinued)


--- Quote ---MS Linux to have Start Button
Microsoft is working to incorporate the well known "Start" button from the Windows Platform into X Windows' Gnome interface. "We just can't figure out how the hell to get that darn foot out of there! The damn thing is like stuck." The team will have this feature ready by product launch.
--- End quote ---

MrX:
ive used linspire and it's stupid, and slow. nothing you can get is free with it.
but- people who need warnings on their beverages telling them their cofee could be hot, this is for you, because even a dog can use it with their flash turourial.

mandrakelinux
its bloatware, and freaky slow. it looks stupid on kde, and you cant change 'themes' easily.
the only thing good is that it comes with boatloads of software.

win2000
talk about slow, and stupid, and insecure. a fresh  install, and wait a day and you will get about 10 virus' . windows 98 is more secure than this.
the only thing good, is that the person on the computer, its hard for them to do really anything bad with deepfreeze on it if you are restricted account:
and if you arent on the computer (like remotely hacking it) its as easy as stealing candy from a baby.

Mr X

mobrien_12:

--- Quote from: WMD ---Linare:
SCO Linux: (discontinued)
--- End quote ---


Was SCO Linux actully that bad?  I used Caldera Linux for years, and was more or less satisfied.

I never tried SCO Linux because I didn't feel the need to update when Caldera changed their name to SCO and released a new version, and then Darl turned them into scum.

bedouin:
Linspire, since it ends up on cheap machines that enter the average person's home, and subsequently gives Linux a bad name.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version