Author Topic: dvzine.org  (Read 3061 times)

Lord C

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Kudos: 15
    • http://www.lordcalvin.co.uk/
dvzine.org
« on: 19 June 2005, 01:35 »
I'm learning to type from scratch

checkout http://dvzine.org/
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

011000110110000101101100011101100110100101101110
Linux user #348855

solemnwarning

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 747
  • Kudos: 338
    • http://www.solemnwarning.net
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #1 on: 19 June 2005, 01:50 »
Quote from: Lord C
I'm learning to type from scratch

checkout http://dvzine.org/

HOW IS THAT KEYBOARD LAYOUT SIMPLER THEN QWERTY????
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
 Version: 3.1
 GCS/CM d- s+:+ a--- C++ UL++++>$ P+ L+++ !E W++ !N !o !K-- w !O !M !V PS+ PE- !Y !PGP !t !5 !X !R tv b+ DI+ !D G e- h !r y-
 ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Kintaro

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6,545
  • Kudos: 255
  • I want to get the band back together!
    • JohnTate.org
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #2 on: 19 June 2005, 08:18 »
Asdfghjkl

KernelPanic

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Kudos: 222
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #3 on: 19 June 2005, 13:45 »
zxcvbnm

Dvorak always intrigued me, but i've never been bothered to make the change.
Contains scenes of mild peril.

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #4 on: 20 June 2005, 01:53 »
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/

Wow. I'm gonna learn Dvorak as soon as I get home - and that's soon! July 29!

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #5 on: 20 June 2005, 01:54 »
Oh, and BTW, Dvorak was of Czech origin - like me :). What dissapoints me is the fact that a Dvorak Keyboard Layout is not available in Czech. Or at least not as elaborate.

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #6 on: 20 June 2005, 02:20 »
Quote from: solemnwarning
HOW IS THAT KEYBOARD LAYOUT SIMPLER THEN QWERTY????

The QWERTY layout was designed specifically to slow typists down. It's ended up becoming a standard by pretty much by accident.

Read the history of Dvorak and QUERTY and you'll see.
:)

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #7 on: 20 June 2005, 17:37 »
Toadlife: Not really. You read. The Qwerty was designed by Sholes because of jamming Typewriters, but not to slow ppl down, just to separate common digraphs (th, ei, ie, ck, st etc.). The slow-'em-down thing is a myth. I begin to realise just how I hate this random keyboard layout...

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #8 on: 20 June 2005, 19:29 »
I can't convert my keyboard to Dvorak, since it's a British one ;)

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #9 on: 20 June 2005, 21:22 »
Quote from: Jenda
Toadlife: Not really. You read. The Qwerty was designed by Sholes because of jamming Typewriters, but not to slow ppl down, just to separate common digraphs (th, ei, ie, ck, st etc.). The slow-'em-down thing is a myth. I begin to realise just how I hate this random keyboard layout...

Okay, yes it was designed to keep fast typists from jamming mechanical typewriters, but then end result was the same - it slowed people down. A permanent solution to a temporary problem.
:)

Lord C

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Kudos: 15
    • http://www.lordcalvin.co.uk/
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #10 on: 20 June 2005, 21:54 »
Quote from: Refalm
I can't convert my keyboard to Dvorak, since it's a British one ;)


What a rubbish excuse lol.
My keyboard is British.

I tried it without changing the keys around, was fine.

I decided to re-arrenge the keys, to dedicate myself.

You lose the pound sign. That's all :-)
Alt-codes anyone ;-)

Quote from: solemnwarning
HOW IS THAT KEYBOARD LAYOUT SIMPLER THEN QWERTY????


Read the 'zine.
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

011000110110000101101100011101100110100101101110
Linux user #348855

Kintaro

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6,545
  • Kudos: 255
  • I want to get the band back together!
    • JohnTate.org
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #11 on: 20 June 2005, 22:37 »
I feel I have learned QWERTY pretty well so I will stick with that.

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #12 on: 20 June 2005, 23:27 »
Quote from: Lord C
What a rubbish excuse lol.
My keyboard is British.

I tried it without changing the keys around, was fine.

I decided to re-arrenge the keys, to dedicate myself.

You lose the pound sign. That's all :-)
Alt-codes anyone ;-)

How about keys like # and ` and '? They are different from US ones.

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #13 on: 21 June 2005, 00:27 »
Quote from: toadlife
Okay, yes it was designed to keep fast typists from jamming mechanical typewriters, but then end result was the same - it slowed people down. A permanent solution to a temporary problem.

 Well, no. It was changed even before there were any typists. The Remington, the first  typewriter available to public already had the Qwerty. But I agree, it was not (by Sholes) intended to be a final solution, just temporary. And there is no reason to be using the Qwerty, whatsoever. I have some trouble though, because there is no Czech version... and to think Dvorak was Czech!!!

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: dvzine.org
« Reply #14 on: 21 June 2005, 11:43 »
Quote from: Jenda
Well, no. It was changed even before there were any typists. The Remington, the first  typewriter available to public already had the Qwerty. But I agree, it was not (by Sholes) intended to be a final solution, just temporary. And there is no reason to be using the Qwerty, whatsoever. I have some trouble though, because there is no Czech version... and to think Dvorak was Czech!!!

You live in Canada, get the French version :)