All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
US copyright office thinking of going partially IE only
worker201:
Gimp and Fireworks do good png work. In fact, png is Fireworks native format. I can't really speak for Adobe Photoshop, since I don't use it very often, and almost never for web graphics work.
There's nothing really wrong with jpeg as a web-deployable format, since it compresses quickly and strongly. Which makes it good for complex bitmaps, like photos. But I would never use it for non-web - that's what tiff is for.
Aloone_Jonez:
PNG even supports diffetent colour depths, 1, 4, 8 and 24 bit modes are supported, the only disadvantege it has it it lacks animation.
DBX_5:
--- Quote from: Aloone_Jonez ---PNG even supports diffetent colour depths, 1, 4, 8 and 24 bit modes are supported, the only disadvantege it has it it lacks animation.
--- End quote ---
That could be an Advantage, because sometimes animation on webpages are very annoying. Some people here would approve.
MarathoN:
Yeah, I hate Flash Banners!
noob:
--- Quote from: Orethrius ---So basically, you don't like the W3C because it produces pages that show up properly in ALL browsers (MSIE included)? What about Safari, Konqueror, and Galeon? You realize that makes you worse than Microsoft, since you're effectively telling MSIE not to view your site and thus shooting any potential "switch to *x* browser" effort you may launch squarely in the foot? I mean, don't take this personally, but don't you think you're being a little petty by shutting out browsers like that? What if somebody has Firefox identifying as MSIE to get into, say, their bank's billpay site? What then? :p
--- End quote ---
nothing to do with the agent, its stuff in the html engine. ie doesnt like parts of my site. im not recoding it all just soit looke great in ie.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version