Stop Microsoft

Operating Systems => Linux and UNIX => Topic started by: Ice-9 on 29 November 2002, 00:08

Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: Ice-9 on 29 November 2002, 00:08
Quick update.
After trying everything I could find on the subject I did a reinstall of RH 8.
Problem is still the same, I checked /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and everything seems fine.

I ran dhclient eth0 and it gives me this :
Listening on LPF/eth0/00:90:27:91:44:e4
Sending on   LPF/eth0/00:90:27:91:44:e4
Sending on   Socket/fallback
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 15
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 19
No DHCPOFFERS received.
No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.

Now I called my isp's helpdesk (jeez they were quick to tell me that they didn't give support for Linux) and asked a few questions, the guy told me that to the best of his knowledge it had to do with the "exchange protocols" between Win2K and RH ????
He could probably solve it easy but it was impossible by phone, I had to call in tech support from the store where I bought RH.

I don't know if it was the tone he used but I had the impression that he was bullshitting me to get rid of me asap.

Does this make any sense to anyone?
What are "exchange protocols" and what do they do, and more important can I alter something to resolve my connection problems?

Sorry to nag everyone with this again.
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 29 November 2002, 00:26
Well it's definitely a DHCP issue. Some incompatibility between Win2k DHCP server (I assume that is what they are using from what your tech support guys said) and the DHCP client that comes with RedHat. You might try removing the "dhclient" package and installing the older one from RedHat 7.3 called "dhcpcd" found here:

ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-7.i386.rpm (http://ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-7.i386.rpm)

If you would like I can try it out on my laptop first (dual booting RH8 and RH73) to make sure there is nothing more that needs to be done. I see the "ifup" script still looks for either "dhcpcd" or "pump" or "dhclient" all of which are DHCP clients. That just might be the trick to get you going.

[edit]
P.S. I just tried it on my laptop without a hitch using these steps:

# wget ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-7.i386.rpm (http://ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.3/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-7.i386.rpm)
# rpm -e dhclient
# rpm -Uvh dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-7.i386.rpm
# ifdown eth0
# ifup eth0

It obtained a new lease using 7.3's DHCP client with no problem.
[/edit]

[ November 28, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: KernelPanic on 29 November 2002, 00:35
What is the hostname of your Linux box? What was your hostname when you used 7.3?
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: Ice-9 on 29 November 2002, 00:44
quote:
Well it's definitely a DHCP issue. Some incompatibility between Win2k DHCP server (I assume that is what they are using from what your tech support guys said) and the DHCP client that comes with RedHat. You might try removing the "dhclient" package and installing the older one from RedHat 7.3 called "dhcpcd" found here:


I called them again and their DHCP servers run under Linux.
I hade a somewhat friendlier guy on the phone this time, he looked at my logs and told me that he could see an attempt from my side to obtain an IP address which was refused "because of something that looks like a firewall or something" (his exact words)
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 29 November 2002, 00:48
Couple of things, first what does "# iptables -L" output look like (please post it if at all possible).

Second, I believe downgrading to dhcpd as I mentioned in my previous note may solve it if your firewall isn't blocking anything. I just found someone else with the same problem in bugzilla and they also said the dhcpcd does work for him:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73369 (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73369)
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: Ice-9 on 29 November 2002, 01:14
Here's wat iptables -L gives me :
[root@localhost root]# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source    destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source    destination

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source    destination

This is with iptables service stopped.
Now, I'll try to install dhcpcd but is there anything I'd have to configure for it to load?
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 29 November 2002, 01:20
Then you don't have a firewall issue.

No there is nothing you have to configure. Just remove dhclient and install dhcpcd and it will work. And I am slightly confident that it will solve your problem once and for all. If it does I might suggest you add to that bugzilla article stating you had the same problem. I will also do a RedHat tip on the subject in case it comes up again which it surely will since it's obvoisly a bug in dhclient under some situations.

[ November 28, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: Ice-9 on 29 November 2002, 01:37
YES YES YES!!!!!!!! IT WORKED!!!!!!
void main, I just don't know how to thank you man!
If you ever decide to come to Belgium again, let me know, food and drinks are on me!

I'll add it to the bugzilla article right away and let my isp know also, just in case, you can never know if someone over there tries to give some sort of support for Red Hat it might come in handy.
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 29 November 2002, 02:06
Thanks, I'll take a case of your favorite local Belgium brew.  (http://smile.gif)  I will work for European brew!
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: DC on 29 November 2002, 23:32
quote:
Originally posted by void main:
I'll take a case of your favorite local Belgium brew.

Err, it isn't THAT good.

Oh wait.

It is.

Do note that *european* beer is not by definition good. We have our share of crap beer. We do have a *lot* of good beers though.
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 30 November 2002, 02:31
I've been all over Europe and have had probably 100 different beers. From what I recall, the worst European beer was far better than the best American beer. That's not counting American microbrews, there are some very good microbrews, one or two locally here are very much like good European beer.

Actually now that I think about it, I'm not fond of the Spanish beer (San Miguel is piss water).
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: Master of Reality on 30 November 2002, 02:54
what about the good ol' Canadian beer... tahts some good shit.
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 30 November 2002, 03:01
I would probably like Canadian beer as well. I seem to recall having Moosehead before. I have to make a point of getting up there sometime. Do you know of any good off-road vehicle parks up there? Maybe me and some buddies can go on a camping/biking trip up there some time.

Oh, one thing about the European beers. The stuff that is imported into the US is complete and utter garbage. It tastes *nothing* like what it does in Europe. For instance, Heineken in Europe is excellent. Heineken, Lowenbau, Bitburger, etc, in the US tastes and smells like a skunk pissed in the bottle and then they capped and refridgerated it. It is no resemblance of the same labeled beer in Europe. I don't know if the Canadian Imports would be similar. I sometimes wonder if Budweiser has people planted at the borders to do something to the beer as it comes across so as not to hurt business.

[ November 29, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: lazygamer on 30 November 2002, 04:45
Do you think it's possible, that if I were to taste some European beers, I might actually consider the notion of semi-liking it?

I honestly hate beer, even Canadian beer, so much that I would much rather drink straight rum in tiny shots, then drink beer. You get a harsh bitter taste, but it's a rush of feeling.... so unique. Then after you've drunken enough rumz0r, you get drunk.  :cool:  

Of course, if I had my way I would have the rum mixed with the cola. If I had my way even more, I would drink pussy alcohol that tastes good IE:Coolers. If i had my way even more, I would drink pussy alcohol that tastes good yet is very strong alcohol wise(does such a thing exsist).  (http://smile.gif)
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: KernelPanic on 30 November 2002, 04:50
quote:
Originally posted by lazygamer:
Do you think it's possible, that if I were to taste some European beers, I might actually consider the notion of semi-liking it?

I honestly hate beer, even Canadian beer, so much that I would much rather drink straight rum in tiny shots, then drink beer. You get a harsh bitter taste, but it's a rush of feeling.... so unique. Then after you've drunken enough rumz0r, you get drunk.   :cool:  

Of course, if I had my way I would have the rum mixed with the cola. If I had my way even more, I would drink pussy alcohol that tastes good IE:Coolers. If i had my way even more, I would drink pussy alcohol that tastes good yet is very strong alcohol wise(does such a thing exsist).   (http://smile.gif)  



You've got a way to go yet. But one day, you'll be a man my son  (http://smile.gif)
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: voidmain on 30 November 2002, 04:51
If you don't like beer already, chances are you will not like Eoropean beer. Although there are many many flavors and type. Wheat beer is an interesting thing indeed. You probably wouldn't drink it if you looked in the bottom of the bottle though.

As far as the whimpy tasting drink with high alcohol content have you ever tried a Long Island Ice Tea? I'm not exactly sure what goes into it other than it is nothing more than around 5 types of hard alcohol mixed together, nothing else. It's amazing but the types of alcohol used somehow counteract each others alcohol taste. You would swear it's a non-alcoholic drink but it'll knock you on your ass if you drink too much of it.

Margarita is pretty good too if yer in to girly drinks. Nothin' beats good ol' beer though.

[edit]
I take it back, just did a web search and it's not made up entirely of alcohol. But you can't taste the alcohol in this drink. And it has your favorite as one of the ingredients (rum):

http://www.drinkboy.com/Cocktails/recipes/LongIslandIceTea.html (http://www.drinkboy.com/Cocktails/recipes/LongIslandIceTea.html)

I would guess it's the lemon juice that kills the alcohol taste more than anything.
[/edit]

[ November 29, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: lazygamer on 30 November 2002, 05:26
YAY! I love pussy drinks!  (http://smile.gif)
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: choasforages on 30 November 2002, 06:16
damn U.S. laws on drinking and drugs. here is how i think that they should be remade.

A) fuck your mind up as you please, just buy your drugs from a local suppler that is suppleid by a country that doesn't support terrorists

B) fuck no one elses lives up in the process, only your own,

and numerous other cluases should apply, but for B, drunk driving, under my new system would be an offense not so easily gotten out of like these days
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: choasforages on 30 November 2002, 06:17
and long island ice tea looks to be some VERY GOOD SHIT
Title: A few more questions - same problem
Post by: LorKorub on 1 December 2002, 17:41
quote:
and long island ice tea looks to be some VERY GOOD SHIT


Long Island Ice Tea is a nice drink, however, here in California we have a more preferred concoction called the Long Beach Ice Tea.  It used Cranberry juice in place of that nasty fucking sour mix.  Nothing will make you hurl quicker than an excess of Gin and sour mix, during the course of a drinking bender.

And, American beer all sucks. Actually, I'll rephrase that: ALL BEER THAT YOU BUY IN AMERICA SUCKS. Even when you go and grab an import, you get maybe half of what it is supposed to taste like, but the alcohol content is entirely filtered out. I think the law here is that beer can't be more that 6% alcohol by volume (Malt liquos contains more, but that shit is even worse than drinking fermented horse-piss.)

"Micro-Brew" is the biggest bunch of horseshit I have ever heard of in my life.  90% of them all taste the same (with a few exceptions. Notably Mack and Jacks ((Seattle)) and Yuengling ((Philly)). Same thing though...low alcohol content, but with a hefty price.

So, the moral of the story is, is you are ever in America, illegal drugs are the way to go.  You get more bang for your buck, and the chicks all like to party on them.

[ December 01, 2002: Message edited by: LorKorub / BOB ]