Stop Microsoft

Operating Systems => Linux and UNIX => Topic started by: <anouymous> on 1 December 2001, 03:10

Title: Games
Post by: <anouymous> on 1 December 2001, 03:10
One reason I don't like about Linux asshole. Is that they don;t support much games. Like
Machwarrior and baldur's gate.
Title: Games
Post by: CommonSense on 1 December 2001, 04:05
Buy a console, for fuck's sake.
Title: Games
Post by: k3it4r0u on 1 December 2001, 04:08
quote:
Originally posted by <anouymous>:
One reason I don't like about Linux asshole. Is that they don;t support much games. Like
Machwarrior and baldur's gate.



Buy one of those fucking Warriner's English Grammar and Composition textbooks.
Title: Games
Post by: asdf on 1 December 2001, 04:14
quote:
Originally posted by <anouymous>:
One reason I don't like about Linux asshole. Is that they don;t support much games. Like
Machwarrior and baldur's gate.



have you ever seen lokigames.com or linuxquake.com?
Title: Games
Post by: saquarrier on 1 December 2001, 06:41
There are some games for Linux and I try to use the ones that there are, but basicly games are the only reason that I haven't nuked my windows partition.
Title: Games
Post by: CommonSense on 1 December 2001, 06:59
Two words:

Dual boot.
Title: Games
Post by: eric on 1 December 2001, 20:16
If i want to try a linux os,who is the best? redhat, mandrake ect ect.........
Title: Games
Post by: k3it4r0u on 2 December 2001, 03:37
Depends on your skill level. RedHat and Mandrake are easy to install. If you try Debian on your first shot, there's a good chance you'll fuck up.
Title: Games
Post by: eric on 2 December 2001, 12:07
ok then i wil have a go on redhad or mandrake.there's a first time for every thing.hope its user friendly so other people start using it too.
Title: Games
Post by: asdf on 2 December 2001, 17:56
red hat and mandrake were designed in a way that the average user can use it. the isntallation process is quite easy. debian isn't any less user-friendly than red hat or mandrake (red hat and mandrake don't have apt-get! how about that) but the easier distributions of linux tend to do more things automatically for you (they will even partition your hard drive for you.. red hat 7.2 at least)
Title: Games
Post by: asdf on 2 December 2001, 17:58
has anybody out there tried mandrake's new "gamers edition"?
Title: Games
Post by: badkarma on 3 December 2001, 18:14
quote:
Originally posted by eric:
If i want to try a linux os,who is the best? redhat, mandrake ect ect.........


if it's your first try at linux I'd recommend SuSE, very easy to install and a huge selection of software comes with it. (7 cd's or 1 dvd for the professional edition)
Title: Games
Post by: <aline> on 4 December 2001, 00:28
What speed is your internet connection. Redhat and mandrake are the easiest to install, but the hardest to get. If you can download from the internet get Mandrake. Otherwise I'd recommend getting Debian, and a GOOD BIG book on the subject.
Title: Games
Post by: Sinistar on 4 December 2001, 13:51
Hmm...games...try using WinE, if you can't find the game you're looking for as a *Nix version.

It's supposed to work ok, but it reminds you of most other emulator-soft; it's unstable as hell.

Hmm, I wonder if we could sway (mail, rt-discussion, forum, or...?) all those darn game developers to use a *Nix platform as the standard, 'cause that would allow more people to play their games, instead of trying to force Monopoly-Soft down everyone's throats...

I mean, if people are still misguided enough to use The-OS-that-shall-not-be-mentioned, then have them use CygWin or something, or even better, why can't the damn game developers incorporate a CygWin mini-shell into the games, to be used when necessary, while basing the games themselves on a certain stable platform... ;)

...checkout CygWin on http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/ (http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/)
Title: Games
Post by: gump420 on 4 December 2001, 14:22
Well, Apple has been pushing hard in the last year or two to get game developers swayed over to their platform, so hopefully that will have a trickle-down effect to the rest of the *NIX world with OS X in the works. Not that this is what Apple wants (if they had it there way, everybody would be writing their programs strictly in Objective-C and would only be using Mach-O binaries) . . . however, one would certainly hope that porting a game from a Unix-based OS that uses OpenGL (read: Mac OS X) to other *NIX variants would be easier than say, porting Win32+DirectX crap to *NIX and OpenGL.

Somebody should come out with a console aimed directly at competing with the X-Box. Load it up with a *NIX kernel with OpenGL support, for starters . . .
Title: Games
Post by: badkarma on 4 December 2001, 23:50
http://www.transgaming.com (http://www.transgaming.com)

haven't tried it yet and the prepackaged binaries are only available to subscribers (for a min. of 5$ a month) so compiler knowledge (at least the use of one  ;) ) is essential.
Title: Games
Post by: foobar on 7 December 2001, 22:20
quote:
Originally posted by eric:
If i want to try a linux os,who is the best? redhat, mandrake ect ect.........


Hya eric,

I don't know about redhat or mandrake, they seem to be the most easy, but what i do know is that SuSe Linux is a very good Linux os. You should try
it: http://www.suse.com (http://www.suse.com)
Title: Games
Post by: voidmain on 8 December 2001, 03:41
Although at this point in Linux distros I am the most familiar with RedHat 5/6/7, somewhat familiar with Mandrake and Debian I make it a point not to recommend one distro over another (unless you plan to make an internet server out of it).  The reason for this is no matter which distro you pick, once it's installed you have basically the same underlying software, and if you don't you can get what's missing and install it on the others very easily.  When people say one distro is easier than another, they really should say "the installation process is easier on X than on Y distro".  

Having said that, though all distros are made up from the same basic software packages (with a few distro specific additions) they all don't have the same default configuration of those softare packages once installed which is why you may spend more time upgrading the indivual packages and reconfiguring and securing one distro over another when it comes to using as an Internet server.  There is no distro out there that ships in a secure configuration.  Some take a lot more work than others to tighten up.

[ December 10, 2001: Message edited by: VoidMain ]

Title: Games
Post by: jtpenrod on 9 December 2001, 21:33
"Redhat and mandrake are the easiest to install, but the hardest to get."

Go to: Linux Central (http://linuxcentral.com) You can get the Mandrake CD set for $5.95 + shipping. They also have CDs for just about any distro you could want. They don't, however, offer any documentation. You can get that seperately without too much trouble.

You can also try:Mandrake Linux (http://www.mandrakelinux.com) Here, you can get the Mandrake boxed set, complete with CDs, documentation, and some freebies: mouse pad, Mandrake stickers and decals, and also tech support. You can also find sources for Iso downloads, however, that's more trouble than it's worth unless you have a fast connection. It would take a dog's age over dial-up.
Title: Games
Post by: gump420 on 10 December 2001, 19:03
I don't know why Mandrake or RedHat would be hard to obtain at all. Just about every electronics store I've ever been to, including stores like Wal-Mart or Target, seem to have either one or both of those distros in their software section.
Title: Games
Post by: Calum on 25 November 2002, 18:55
yes, and you can download them from linuxiso.org or from the manufacturers' websites.
Title: Games
Post by: Pantso on 25 November 2002, 18:58
WTF? This thread is almost a year old!   :D