Stop Microsoft

All Things Microsoft => Microsoft as a Company => Topic started by: sime on 25 August 2003, 11:54

Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: sime on 25 August 2003, 11:54
Try this...

http://www.linuxsucks.com/ (http://www.linuxsucks.com/)

Sime
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: Pissed_Macman on 25 August 2003, 12:56
Wow, what a horribly designed site. But I did agree with most of their content. I mean, Linux does suck ass compared to Windows.

j/k  :D
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: bigsleep on 25 August 2003, 14:50
Typical Frontpage crap.

W3C Validation Results:
 
quote:

 I was not able to extract a character encoding labeling from any of the valid sources for such information. Without encoding information it is impossible to validate the document. The sources I tried are:

    * The HTTP Content-Type field.
    * The XML Declaration.
    * The HTML "META" element.

And I even tried to autodetect it using the algorithm defined in Appendix F of the XML 1.0 Recommendation.

Since none of these sources yielded any usable information, I will not be able to validate this document. Sorry. Please make sure you specify the character encoding in use.

 
quote:

Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!

I could not parse this document, because it does not include a DOCTYPE Declaration. A DOCTYPE Declaration is mandatory for most current markup languages and without such a declaration it is impossible to validate this document.

DOCTYPE Override in effect:
 
quote:

This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser.
...

Results (http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linuxsucks.com%2F&charset=iso-8859-1+%28Western+Europe%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Transitional)

W3C CSS Validator Results for http://www.linuxsucks.com/ (http://www.linuxsucks.com/)

1 Error
4 Warnings
Results (http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linuxsucks.com%2F&warning=1&profile=css2)

Any idiot can write bad HTML, what do we need Frontpage for?
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: jasonlane on 26 August 2003, 03:55
quote:
Originally posted by Macman:
Wow, what a horribly designed site. But I did agree with most of their content. I mean, Linux does suck ass compared to Windows.

j/k   :D  



What are you on about Macman, I'm a fellow OS X user but I still know linux kicks the shit out of ANYTHING M$ can do.

You just need a brain and an opposable thumb to use it is all.
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: cahult on 26 August 2003, 04:06
quote:
Originally posted by Zardoz:



What are you on about Macman, I'm a fellow OS X user but I still know linux kicks the shit out of ANYTHING M$ can do.

You just need a brain and an opposable thumb to use it is all.


He was only kidding. Macman is this way sometimes. Irony, not always funny but ironic, as Jay Leno said once when people didn
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: Pissed_Macman on 26 August 2003, 07:55
quote:
Originally posted by Zardoz:



What are you on about Macman, I'm a fellow OS X user but I still know linux kicks the shit out of ANYTHING M$ can do.

You just need a brain and an opposable thumb to use it is all.


j/k means just kidding (hence the fact that I was just kidding). Yes, Linux kicks ass.

[ August 25, 2003: Message edited by: Macman ]

Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: Jens14 on 27 August 2003, 16:33
OMG whats that all about, better not start looking
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: Calum on 27 August 2003, 18:16
it's a parody site. many people don't seem to realise that the linuxsucks site is deliberately made to look sad and pathetic.
Title: Alternative to microsuck???
Post by: bigsleep on 28 August 2003, 15:05
I found a great Windows tip (http://www.userfriendly.org/animation/episode1.html) through a link on that site!