Stop Microsoft

Operating Systems => macOS => Topic started by: bcortens on 17 July 2002, 23:18

Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: bcortens on 17 July 2002, 23:18
Go here and sign the petition

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/iTol/petition.html (http://www.PetitionOnline.com/iTol/petition.html)
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 17 July 2002, 23:38
Nice   :D  

Im EDIT: *Number omited, privacy retained*

Opps! heh heh

[ July 17, 2002: Message edited by: psyjax ]

Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: trc3 on 18 July 2002, 11:04
Please everyone sign this petition even if you arent a mac user.  Try and save apple from turning into a microsoft!!!  I think this os 10 update nonsense is a travisty, i sure as hell aint paying $130 for this bullshit.  I dont expect it for free but come on $130!!!  I cant even begin to imagine how mad i would be if i had just gone out and bought os 10.1 and now this crap.  I bought a mac to get away from this kind of SHIT, upgrades every other day, taking about all these new "features" that should have been in the first one!  Come on apple show some class...


Sorry to rant, [i had to get it out] I like apple but this is terrible..

[ July 18, 2002: Message edited by: trc3 ]

Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: choasmaster on 18 July 2002, 11:14
i just signed it even though im pissed at my powerbook right now. i think that is bullshit
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: Master of Reality on 18 July 2002, 11:34
I signed.. but i dont really give a shit because the only reason i dont 'hate' mac is because it is more stable than windows... but that isnt hard to accomplish
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: choasmaster on 18 July 2002, 13:20
not to mention that it doesn't use that shitty x86 hardware.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 18 July 2002, 20:01
quote:
Originally posted by trc3:
Please everyone sign this petition even if you arent a mac user.  Try and save apple from turning into a microsoft!!!  I think this os 10 update nonsense is a travisty, i sure as hell aint paying $130 for this bullshit.  I dont expect it for free but come on $130!!!  I cant even begin to imagine how mad i would be if i had just gone out and bought os 10.1 and now this crap.  I bought a mac to get away from this kind of SHIT, upgrades every other day, taking about all these new "features" that should have been in the first one!  Come on apple show some class...


Sorry to rant, [i had to get it out] I like apple but this is terrible..

[ July 18, 2002: Message edited by: trc3 ]



I don't know about .Mac .

But I think the OSX upgrade is worth it, it's hardly a windows style upgrade. Lot's pf worthwhile goodies are included and your avarage windows upgrade is usualy twice as much.

Besies, if you wait a month the price will drop.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: ravuya on 18 July 2002, 21:29
Damn, I just looked at the signatures and there are a lot of Mac users ticked off about this one. 9837, to be exact.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 19 July 2002, 05:13
BTW.. Im ordering Jaguare now, the upgrade is only 69 bucks for those that are running 10.1 or 10.0 so it's worth it IMHO.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: alucard on 19 July 2002, 08:21
quote:
Originally posted by psyjax:
BTW.. Im ordering Jaguare now, the upgrade is only 69 bucks for those that are running 10.1 or 10.0 so it's worth it IMHO.


Where did you see that?  I only see where, as of yesterday, if you bu a new Mac  10.2 is 20 bucks.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: the_black_angel on 19 July 2002, 08:24
Its up to 13284. damn
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: cahult on 19 July 2002, 10:19
I actually think it
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 19 July 2002, 21:25
quote:
Originally posted by alucard:


Where did you see that?  I only see where, as of yesterday, if you bu a new Mac  10.2 is 20 bucks.



Hehe... oops. It's a student discount thing, I imagine it's going to come installed on new Mac's, that is for free.

So if you are a student, it's only 69 just call up apple to order.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: bcortens on 20 July 2002, 00:41
17,000 votes now  ;)
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: CommonSense on 20 July 2002, 02:19
What I find funny is that (a) this is the #1 most active petition on petitiononline.com (as of Friday afternoon, July 19), and that (b) there's a counter-petition (that basically says "stop whining" located here (http://www.petitiononline.com/MUAMW/petition.html) that's almost as popular.

In any event, I signed on against the .mac fees.  I won't be paying; I don't have any great need for the services myself, and I already have 37,693 e-mail addresses as it is.

I didn't see anything in this petition about the $129 fee for OS X 10.2, though . . . where'd you get that from?  (I get 10.2 and 10.2 Server free anyway, being a member of the Apple Consultant's Network.    (http://smile.gif)  )
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: rtgwbmsr on 20 July 2002, 21:22
I just signed it:
19457 Signatures Total
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 20 July 2002, 21:39
.Mac Sux! Period!

Just look at the amount of sigs on each petition. 500+ vs. 19000+!
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: billy_gates on 21 July 2002, 21:34
chaosmaster

what exactly do u have against x86?

It is the cheapest, widest available, seems to be the fastest (in the affordable price range) and seems to be the most expandable.  I know apple claims that their computers are faster than pentium's but I doubt it.  my PowerMac 733MHz G4 runs a hell of a lot slower than out dual 900 pentium system in Photoshop.  It also runs slower than my 1GHz and 1.2GHz Athlons.

This is OSX and WinXP comparison.  I know OS 9 is faster, but it is only fair to use the 2 newest operating systems in a face off, do u not agree?
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: voidmain on 21 July 2002, 21:48
It's not so much that x86 that sucks, it's Windows that *really* sucks.
Title: .Mac overprice Petition
Post by: psyjax on 22 July 2002, 02:23
quote:
Originally posted by Billy Gates:
chaosmaster

what exactly do u have against x86?

It is the cheapest, widest available, seems to be the fastest (in the affordable price range) and seems to be the most expandable.  I know apple claims that their computers are faster than pentium's but I doubt it.  my PowerMac 733MHz G4 runs a hell of a lot slower than out dual 900 pentium system in Photoshop.  It also runs slower than my 1GHz and 1.2GHz Athlons.

This is OSX and WinXP comparison.  I know OS 9 is faster, but it is only fair to use the 2 newest operating systems in a face off, do u not agree?



Try a dual 800 or a dual 500 G4 vs. the same system and you will see a world of diffrence. The 733 was a bit of a fiasco cuz it benchmarked lower than even the dual 500Mhz machines. Right now the dual 500's are the best cheep mac's available if you can find one. The dual 800's too.

It's true that they got AMD's to beat a dual G4 1Ghz. But the machine was a dual 2Ghz and the diffrence was less than 30%. And on certain more hardware intensive tasks that took advantage of altivec the Mac pulled ahed. That's what the benchmarking on Apple's site showes.

This was an old topic coverd a long time ago in the Mac forum. You can look back into the history if you are interested.