Author Topic: Bloody Universal Plug and Play  (Read 3087 times)

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #15 on: 28 January 2006, 22:32 »
Besides, the only use of VB is for the 1337 script kiddies to make easily-blocked virii.

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #16 on: 28 January 2006, 23:03 »
Quote from: worker201
The reason OO isn't compatible with VB Scripts is that VB Scripts are a half-assed implementation that should have been scrapped years ago.  No sane person uses them.

What else can you use it you're using MS Office?

And you tell that to companies who have 1000's of Office documents full of VB macros.
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #17 on: 29 January 2006, 05:53 »
VB macros are bullshit ... and they can be malicious too ... I wouldn't use 'em ... why do companies use them again ?

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #18 on: 29 January 2006, 06:37 »
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
why do companies use them again ?

I believe "lack of willingness to learn a real language, like C or Java" is among the top answers to that question.

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #19 on: 29 January 2006, 15:29 »
I've had to write a VB program at work before, nothing hard just a Spyhawk keyboard tester, that reads values the keyboard sends to the PC via RS232. Once I'd figured out how to use RS232 (which just required custom control) writing the program was fairly straight forward, the problems started when they wanted me to distribute it with an installer.

Instead of writing my own program I used the MS Installer wizard that came with VB and the installer program created was very bloated and buggy (else I could've fitted the whole thing on a floppy). I burned it to a CD and added autoplay but the fucking installer fucked on half of the machines they tried it on, after trying to correct the problem myself I gave up and wrote a good olde batch file installer which did the job in no time at all.
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

Jack2000

  • Guest
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #20 on: 14 February 2006, 18:47 »
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
man that's sad ... why do people have to be so ... ignorant .... I was gonna say stupid, but maybe they can learn ? ... maybe they just don't care ? ... is there any hope of changing them for the better ? ... is it worth trying ? ... live and let die ... ?


Oses are not the problem people should design apps
that should work on every os!
i mean Win, Lin,Mac and shit...!
EVERY OS!

that is the ONLY way to perfection
make non os specific apps!

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #21 on: 14 February 2006, 19:36 »
Quote from: Jack2000
Oses are not the problem people should design apps
that should work on every os!
i mean Win, Lin,Mac and shit...!
EVERY OS!

that is the ONLY way to perfection
make non os specific apps!

The only platform that can succesfully do that is JAVA at the moment.

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #22 on: 14 February 2006, 21:16 »
Yeah, but Java is slow.

Jack2000

  • Guest
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #23 on: 14 February 2006, 23:04 »
Quote from: Refalm
The only platform that can succesfully do that is JAVA at the moment.

What about system level programs
you know 0 and 1 :)
binary ?
are not they native on all platforms ?

worker201

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,810
  • Kudos: 703
    • http://www.triple-bypass.net
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #24 on: 14 February 2006, 23:13 »
Quote from: Jack2000
What about system level programs
you know 0 and 1 :)
binary ?
are not they native on all platforms ?

Nope.
PowerPC chips, for example, are Big-endian, while x86 chips are Little-endian.  Given the binary number 101101100, a Mac's G5 will think that the leftmost decimal place is the lowest, so it will evaluate this number to be 109.  On a Dell with a Pentium, it will think this number is 182, since the rightmost decimal place is the lowest.  Similar stories will be seen in other architectures - I think SPARC and AIX are big-endian too.

davidnix71

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 760
  • Kudos: 501
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #25 on: 15 February 2006, 02:31 »
UPnP came turned on in XP by default, off in ME by default and is available to 98SE but not installed by default.

The real problem is that a common user can crash servers with it by issuing a few simple commands. The FBI at one time issued a request to everyone to turn it off because it can so easily cause such mischief. The service shouldn't even exist in the first place, it's just too dangerous to the user (who deserves the trouble for being too lazy to configure the device in person)

Words fail me over some of the stupid s*it Bill Gates puts in Windows.

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #26 on: 15 February 2006, 03:41 »
Java isn't that slow ... especially with today's processors.

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: Bloody Universal Plug and Play
« Reply #27 on: 15 February 2006, 09:20 »
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
Java isn't that slow ... especially with today's processors.

It actually is slower than a program made in C++ or C#.NET even.