« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: XP vs 2K  (Read 866 times)

badkarma

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
  • Kudos: 0
XP vs 2K
« Reply #15 on: 13 August 2002, 17:37 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
2. choasforages spoke the truth, Windows 2000 needs much hard-disk space and a 133 MHz chip just to run. It needs a 233 MHz chip to run normally.
On a UNIX based server, you can set up a webserver on a 486.


yah ... and I can run a fucking webserver on a Gameboy Advance so why again would I need a 233MHz chip?
Logged
If you can't learn to do something well, learn to enjoy doing it poorly.

Chooco

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
  • Kudos: 0
XP vs 2K
« Reply #16 on: 14 August 2002, 08:28 »
you can actually run a web server on a commadore 64, some dude posted a link at anandtech i think it was. the page said on the first line "this server is run on a commadore 64" then it explains how that was done....it was neato  
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »