Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX
fucking staroffice
Master of Reality:
Ya... this staroffice is still not nearly as bad as office 2000, which i have on my win machine.
slave:
Why do you say that? Star Office is an absolute resource hog and takes about 10 seconds or more to load on even a relativly fast machine. I use Office 2000 and experience no problems at all. At least Office 2000 doesn't render fonts crappily like Star Office does. MS Office may be a little "ahem" because MS doesn't use open file formats (for obvious reasons) but it is loaded with every feature you could possibly want, and most people couldn't do their jobs without it. Heck, I much prefer KOffice to staroffice, at least koffice isn't bloated as hell. Hancom Office looks interesting (it uses the QT toolkit) but it costs money.
slave:
In fact, star office is so lousy that Sun released the source code, since it is worthless to them anyway.
choasforages:
actaully they realesed the source code so they wouldn't have to maintan it for there own use
Master of Reality:
That must be why the thousands of programs licensed under the GPL also have released their souorce, huh winXPiss luser? If you really have that outlook about Open Source then there is something seriously wrong with you
[ June 12, 2002: Message edited by: Master of Reality / Bob ]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version