Operating Systems > macOS

You guys think that Macs are so damn fast? Have a look at this.

<< < (6/7) > >>

cahult:

quote:Originally posted by VoidMain:
I don't have to post my times, I never turn my computers off.  I guess that would be "0" seconds.
--- End quote ---


Wow, how much is your bill?  :D

choasforages:
i do the same thing, the only machine i knows boot time is mine, with Redhat 7.3, it boots in about a minute or so. with FreeBSD, it boots in under 20 seconds, ChoasNETOS is he fastest but ive never measured it

Zombie9920:

quote:Originally posted by Macman:
Do I have to remind you people again that you cannot compare Mac and PC speed. They are two different configurations. The Mac's processor does move more slowly, but it is also more efficient. PCs have to move more quickly and they still don't measure up to the Mac. So zombie, you're right. In many cases PCs' processors are faster, but only because they have to work harder.

Zombie, you are an idiot! Everything you've posted here has been countered by us. You know this as well as I do, so please quit fighting us just to fight.
--- End quote ---



Ehhh? It is more like Macs don't measure up to the x86 PC. I think that it is perfectly clear that the fastest PC's available right now kick the dog shit out of the fastest Macs available now. The PC's will only continue to keep getting faster while your beloved Macs are still struggling to get faster than 1 ghz. The fastest PC's available today(the ones that whip the shit out of the Macs) are also cheaper than the fastest Macs. PC's are better by a longshot because they are faster, cheaper, keep evolving, have more hardware available to them(and more faster hardware being made every week), have more software and more OS chioces than the Mac.

Macs are overpriced hunks of junk that are made for fools who believe Steve Jobs' propoganda. It is no wonder why PC's have so much more market share than Macs.
 
PS. You haven't countered a damn thing buddy. This post was made to show that Macs are not "all that". Nothing that has been posted in this topic counters that either. Face the fact...your Mac is a dinosaur compared to state of the art PC's. The truth is a bitter pill to swallow.

[ August 21, 2002: Message edited by: Zombie9920 ]

socokid:
Winblows XP User:


"I'm sorry your mediocre Macintosh can't handle web pages with frames and pictures, but don't take it out on us Windows users."


What an idiot. My god. Even the most novice of computer users would realize that is has EVERYTHING to do with the browser app, and NOTHING to do with the OS with regard to page rendering. What an idiot.


quote: Like any of the professional video editors or Photoshop experts will even care. Graphics and Video professionals are more concerned with the user interface, stability, and lack of hardware and OS headaches than crap like benchmarks.

"They should be concerened since x86 hardware is cheaper and more powerful."

Holy crap. Of COURSE their cheaper, they SUCK! They're power hungry heat machines. Anyone can make something faster by adding more crap to the crap. That's without mentioning the simple fact that more are made. Supply/demand.


"PS Windows XP doesn't crash, you silly gooses"


:) I'll let that one lie... *sigh*

ravuya:

quote:Originally posted by Zombie9920:
your beloved Macs are still struggling to get faster than 1 ghz.
--- End quote ---


Too bad you haven't been keeping up. We went to dual 1.25GHz + DDR about a week ago. If there's something I hate more than an obvious troll (which you are), it's an obvious troll who can't even bother to keep up with what he's bashing.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page