Miscellaneous > The Lounge
So let me get this straight. 15 insepctors
clagh131:
I don't think "Bush" himself has much of a say in anything,..other then to read the pre-written speech given to him. Which I have to say he has gotten quite good at (public speaking).
I would also be suprised to hear that any amount of inspectors sent to Iraq discover anything that's of "shocking news." (Although anything "found" will presented over the news in true SHOCK value form). We will be going to war regardless,.. WHTVR "evidence" the Bush admins decided to use to justify this has long since been determined, and will told to us soon in a speech written for BUSH to relay. BUt I certainly don't believe that the Bush ADMINS are just waiting around to see what is actually FOUND in IRAQ. They know what's there,..and will let us know just whtvr they believe we can handle knowing is there.
Annorax:
Just another example of authority telling us what to think, when to think it, and how hard to suck their dicks when they tell us.
Somehow a trip straight to Hell would do them some good!
Pissed_Macman:
oops accidentally posted twice. Oh well
[ December 03, 2002: Message edited by: Macman: Mac Commando / b0b ]
Pissed_Macman:
quote:Originally posted by choasforages:
its called bush 2.0 is out for war.
too bad hes making a terrible statigic error, we are fighting a war in afgahnistan, but we are starting one in iraq. didn't we learn anything from hitler, or his defeat, the fact that two front wars don't work.
--- End quote ---
Except Germany was a pathetic little country that was going bankrupt back then. The US could fight on ten fronts and win (which isn't necessarily a pleasant thought). In fact we did in WWII and it only took two big-ass nukes.
quote:Originally posted by The Rev. Annorax:
Somehow a trip straight to Hell would do them some good!
--- End quote ---
And you should know, right? How is it down there this time of year, anyway?
DC:
quote:Originally posted by The Rev. Annorax:
There's an easier way to deal with the Saddam problem... atomic weapons? If Baghdad is full of nukes now, point the thing at it and start the new Bush ad campaign, "Baghdad Today, Green Glowing Hole Tomorrow"!!!
End of Saddam problem, and certainly those suicidal motherfuckers will think twice after they see everything they care about reduced to constituent atoms... ;)
--- End quote ---
Atom bombs do NOT explode when you hit them with something. Well, they might, but not in a nuclear blast. That's because you have to specifically shoot two (or more, which is even more impossible) 2-20 Kg metal parts at each other, pretty damn well aligned and have to keep them together for some milliseconds (and the thing wants to BLOW UP HARD if you get 'm together, so that *is* hard). An accidental explosion nearby won't do that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version