All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Ugh
gnomez:
Read this:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/migrate/default.asp
Why do they even try to compare their closed-source piece of shit with the secure and reliable UNIX based solutions? I can see where they may have a desktop argument to use windows, but who the hell needs them or their crappy product to run a server? Besides, all that licensing crap and audits are worse than paying taxes! Who would want to be bogged down by that? I think they are just alarmed by the fact that well over half the web servers in the world run some form of UNIX, and are obviously spreading huge lies in a vain attempt to wow some "In the dark" windows loser to switch his infrastructure. Can I get some agreement?
SpeeDFreaK:
You really shouldn't believe too much that's up on Microsoft's webpage. I can't remember exactly what page it was, but it was about donating used computers to schools. On it, M$ says that it's illegal to donate a computer without it's OS. At that point, I started laughing because it was utter BS. There site never ceases to amuse me...
Ctrl Alt Del 123:
There was a page worse than this, about MS saying how much better Linux was and the info to prove it. Then you have people here saying Linux is better and the links to prove it.
I say, use what works.
PS. Those MS web pages on Windows VS. UNIX in my mind are BIASED PIECES OF SHIT! I like Windows, not MS.
Kintaro:
Why would a webserver need a GUIO in the firstplace.
You may be happy with Windows for a Workstation...
BUT SERVER!?! why did they even release the .net crap and all that other shit. For server. Anyone with a brain would know that Apache and Linux kick ass
FreeBSD is nice too. Fuck Microsoft, and all there crap... They are SHIT!!!
Jonothan:
How can you say that whilst you use their products, including their OS's?
In this case I agree with your initial argument, but do you really believe abuse, and obscenities, make your argument more valid?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version