Miscellaneous > The Lounge
Wake Up
skyman8081:
The steel that was shipped off was steel that could not be identified, NIST took samples from the steel that they could identify from where in the building, and it helped in their investigation of the collapse. It is the steel from the periphery and stuff that was mangled beyond recognition that got mangled.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Try harder next time.
Laukev7:
--- Quote ---and it helped in their investigation of the collapse.
--- End quote ---
Whose investigation? The one sponsored by the government? The very same investigation that's being questioned?
skyman8081:
Look you little shit. You can disagree with the conclusion, but I am talking about COLD HARD FACTS. If you want to deny the inclusion of the data that NIST took from the collapse site samples. Then you have NOTHING but a few pictures to stand on. YOU CAN'T HANDWAVE AWAY EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF ITS SOURCE!
[SIZE=7000]YOU HAVE PROVIDED ZERO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF THE WTC COLLAPSE BEING A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. NOW ADDRESS MY FUCKING POINTS.[/SIZE]
Laukev7:
--- Quote ---YOU CAN'T HANDWAVE AWAY EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF ITS SOURCE!
--- End quote ---
Yes I can. Evidence can be fabricated. The government that conducted the investigation was the same one that fabricated evidence to invade Iraq, and I will only trust the analysis of an independent investigation.
skyman8081:
Iraq is irrelevant to this discussion. This is strictly about the collapse of the WTC. DON'T CHANGE TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT.
Show me evidence of the evidence in question being fabricated. Not iraq, or any tangential examples, but evidence of the WTC collapse evidence itself being faked.
PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version