Miscellaneous > The Lounge
Wake Up
Laukev7:
--- Quote ---Iraq is irrelevant to this discussion.
--- End quote ---
Iraq is irrelevant, but the fact that your government is a bunch of liars isn't. In court, when a person is found guilty of making up evidence, then he is discredited.
--- Quote ---Show me evidence of the evidence in question being fabricated. Not iraq, or any tangential examples, but evidence of the WTC collapse evidence itself being faked.
--- End quote ---
You can't present evidence that they fabricated the evidence unless they make it available. That's the point of an independent investigation.
Orethrius:
The second-hardest thing to prove is a conspiracy (incidentally, Sauron, for the same reason you cited - absence of evidence be not necessarily evidence of absence).
[offtopic]Anybody care to guess at the hardest? ;)[/offtopic]
skyman8081:
Unless you show you show me factual evidence that the evidence that NIST gathered is faked. IT FUCKING STANDS. You are trying to send me off on a tangent. NOW WORK WITH WHAT YOU FUCKING HAVE.
The government lied about something not relevant to this discussion. Therefore using that is not enout to toss the PHSYICAL EVIDENCE GATHERED.
Laukev7:
--- Quote ---Unless you show you show me factual evidence that the evidence that NIST gathered is faked. IT FUCKING STANDS.
--- End quote ---
I can't possibly provide you evidence when I have no access to it. You're admitting yourself that I can only look at pictures. I maintain that there are very compelling arguments to be made for controlled demolition, and an independent investigation is needed to verify them.
You've been yelling at me to give you evidence. I'm not the one who came up with the controlled demolition theory, so I'm not the one you should ask for evidence. I'm not an expert, and I don't claim to be. All I can do is search the web for hours for articles, and I can't guarantee that the evidence I will provide will be correct, or will represent the opinions of the experts who analyse the official theory.
You can yell at me for hours to give you evidence or shut up, all I'm going to give you is circumstantial evidence involving political activities. You can type 'shut up' in bold and large characters all you want, but I will remind you that I am currently the one, aside from two other members, who has the authority to arbitrate on who gets to speak.
skyman8081:
So, you have no information to back up your story. It rests on the idea that the evidence that is out there is faked, without any proof of forgery. I can't buy that tale.
Nice appeal to authority there. Your argument wins because you are a mod. :rolleyes:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version