Author Topic: The shittyest distro  (Read 5917 times)

Lord C

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Kudos: 15
    • http://www.lordcalvin.co.uk/
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #45 on: 30 March 2005, 00:21 »
As regards the worst distro:

Linspire (formely Lindows).
Simply because they lock you into a prepriatory system, and charge you a subscription for it.
Not free or Free, so I don't like it.
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

011000110110000101101100011101100110100101101110
Linux user #348855

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #46 on: 30 March 2005, 00:52 »
Quote from: BaDDaSS
As regards the worst distro:

Linspire (formely Lindows).
Simply because they lock you into a prepriatory system, and charge you a subscription for it.
Not free or Free, so I don't like it.

And the fact that you run standard as "root", making it easier to use.

This is the kind of stuff that gets Linux and unsecurity bundled. Bad users, and now, bad distro's.

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #47 on: 30 March 2005, 01:00 »
Refalm,

If Linspire sucks so much shit then why do you just remove it from the list of alternatives?
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

Kintaro

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6,545
  • Kudos: 255
  • I want to get the band back together!
    • JohnTate.org
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #48 on: 30 March 2005, 06:08 »
Quote from: Aloone_Jonez
Refalm,

If Linspire sucks so much shit then why do you just remove it from the list of alternatives?

 Because its still an alternative.

Kintaro

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6,545
  • Kudos: 255
  • I want to get the band back together!
    • JohnTate.org
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #49 on: 30 March 2005, 06:09 »
Quote from: Refalm
And the fact that you run standard as "root", making it easier to use.

This is the kind of stuff that gets Linux and unsecurity bundled. Bad users, and now, bad distro's.

 The whole default root thing is old news, VERY old news, yaknow.

Or am I wrong?

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #50 on: 30 March 2005, 15:21 »
Quote from: Aloone_Jonez
Refalm,

If Linspire sucks so much shit then why do you just remove it from the list of alternatives?

Because it's not Microsoft, and I'm unable to do that anymore :(
Quote from: kintaro
The whole default root thing is old news, VERY old news, yaknow.

Or am I wrong?

Old news, yes. But still valid.

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #51 on: 23 April 2005, 05:38 »
Quote from: Lord C
If I were to install Windows,
I'd have to install Windows Update...
Run some updates, reboot, run some more updates, reboot as required
More updating and rebooting.
I have SP2 slipstreamed into my XP install disc. One pass at Windows update is all that's required after an install.

Quote from: Lord C
Then i'd have to try and find a free antivirus.
Download and install that.
Reboot and Scan.
Why reboot and scan, if it's a clean system? Turn the XP firewall on before plugging in the Rj45 cable - or if you have win2k, disbale file and printer sharing first.

Quote from: Lord C
Then i'd have to find a free firewall.
Download and install that.
Firewalls are overrated, and uneccessary.The built in XP firewall is sufficient to fend off worm type attacks if your to lazy to turn off services, or patch your machine. Outbound blocking is overrated. If you have malware on your PC, you've already lost the battle.

Quote from: Lord C
Then i'd have to find a free Anti Spyware.
Download and install that.
Why? Do you plan on surfing donkey porn sites using IE while logged on as an administrator?

Quote from: Lord C
Then i'd have to find a free Anti Adware.
Download and install that.
Well since you are so intent on surfing donkey porn, I thought I'd let you know that there are apps that do both adware/spyware.

Quote from: Lord C
Now it's time for searching for drivers for my scanner/printer/mouse/keyboard/monitor/sound card/graphics card/ethernet card/tv card etc.
Install all of those, with rebooting after most.
Oh no! Installing drivers! You never have to do that with Linux, right? You, know, you can install multiple drivers in Windows 2000/XP without having to reboot after each.

Quote from: Lord C
If I were to install Linux,
I would install my favourote dsitro.
Yes, because it's common knowlege that Linux distros magically set themselves up to each users exact specifications without ever needing any kind of post installation maintenance.
:)

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #52 on: 23 April 2005, 20:00 »
Quote from: toadlife
I have SP2 slipstreamed into my XP install disc. One pass at Windows update is all that's required after an install.

So you basically have to buy a new version of Windows XP or order an SP2 CD-ROM to skip all the updates?

Quote from: toadlife
Why reboot and scan, if it's a clean system? Turn the XP firewall on before plugging in the Rj45 cable - or if you have win2k, disbale file and printer sharing first.

You're obviously into computers. Most people aren't, and let their computer on a direct Internet connection.

Quote from: toadlife
Firewalls are overrated, and uneccessary.The built in XP firewall is sufficient to fend off worm type attacks if your to lazy to turn off services, or patch your machine. Outbound blocking is overrated. If you have malware on your PC, you've already lost the battle.

Again, you know how to fend off malware, even with a firewall which believes that outbound blocking is overrated.
But most users don't. How are they supposed to know what's best for them?
And how is outbound blocking supposed to be overrated? It costs less time and effort for a firewall to reject the bad packets before they enter the computer.

Quote from: toadlife
Why? Do you plan on surfing donkey porn sites using IE while logged on as an administrator?

You get spyware in these days by just going to a news site that gets money from Gator, Doubleclick, etc.

Quote from: toadlife
Oh no! Installing drivers! You never have to do that with Linux, right? You, know, you can install multiple drivers in Windows 2000/XP without having to reboot after each.

Installing drivers nowdays is almost done automatically. And if not, you can always install it.

Quote from: toadlife
Yes, because it's common knowlege that Linux distros magically set themselves up to each users exact specifications without ever needing any kind of post installation maintenance.

In the Windows XP installation, you get to choose almost nothing.
And in the Longhorn installation you have two options: admin password and in what directory you want to install it.
No thanks, I prefer the neat packet management of Linux.

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #53 on: 23 April 2005, 20:03 »
Quote
So you basically have to buy a new version of Windows XP or order an SP2 CD-ROM to skip all the updates?

Nah, you can rebuild your XP CD to include files from SP2 instead of the originals.  There's apps that can automate this.
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #54 on: 23 April 2005, 22:13 »
What's so bad about Mandrake? I actually like it. Maybe because it's my first Linux, and apart from that I only tried Ubuntu.

Lord C

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Kudos: 15
    • http://www.lordcalvin.co.uk/
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #55 on: 23 April 2005, 22:59 »
Quote from: Jenda
What's so bad about Mandrake? I actually like it. Maybe because it's my first Linux, and apart from that I only tried Ubuntu.


I too used to like Mandrake, I used it for a very long time.

As soon as I tried Slackware I saw the light ;)
They say "use mandrake you know mandrake, use slackware you know linux".
This is deffinetly true, I learnt a lot about Linux via Slack.

I then discovered Ubuntu, which is a beauty and I love her ;D

Mandrake is bloatware, and so is KDE. Pair them together is a bad idea ;p
I don't think it has a very nice package management system either.
It can handle RPMs, but Fedora is better at it.
It has an 'Installer', which is nothing when compared to Ubuntu's 'Synaptic'.

Quote from: toadlife
If you have malware on your PC, you've already lost the battle.


Are you refering to Windows XP?
« Last Edit: 23 April 2005, 23:05 by Lord C »
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

011000110110000101101100011101100110100101101110
Linux user #348855

Jenda

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 530
  • Kudos: 326
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #56 on: 24 April 2005, 18:20 »
So, is Ubuntu unbloated?
And can I use the mandrake cds I have to install software on my new Ubuntu-to-be?
I know it's probably better do download everything, but I don't have a broadband connection yet... working on it.

Canadian Lover

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 713
  • Kudos: 122
Re: The shittyest distro
« Reply #57 on: 30 April 2005, 17:19 »
Debain sucks! I cant get X to work.